May on the way??

[For Us All]

12 hours ago, mr.hobblesworth said:

Have you got anything sensible or noteworthy to add or are you just going to continue with the stupid little jibes?

Says the bloke obsessed with calling older people gammon.

You couldn't make it up.

 

[For Us All]

18 hours ago, mr.hobblesworth said:

Absolutely. Looks like Hunt's shitty tweet seems to have backfired anyway. I think people are getting wise to the weaponisation of antisemitism by Corbyn/ Labour's enemies.

Jewish Labour supporters aren't.

[mr.hobblesworth]

Well, you could make it up because you just have. Far from being "obsessed", I've used the word about a dozen times in 5,000ish posts. A dozen is probably an over-estimation of the amount of posts that you have made that contain anything of substance or insight.

[mr.hobblesworth]

8 minutes ago, For Us All said:

Jewish Labour supporters aren't.

 

1 hour ago, TheSage said:

Why don't some of you open a thread on Corbyn since you are totally obsessed by him, and anti-semitism? This is supposedly about May, the government, their Brexit policy and what the two candidates are like and stand for. 

 

 

[Fosse69]

1 hour ago, TheSage said:

Why don't some of you open a thread on Corbyn since you are totally obsessed by him, and anti-semitism? This is supposedly about May, the government, their Brexit policy and what the two candidates are like and stand for. 

 

The merit of Brexit would be a start, I doubt if the candidates know what they stand for apart from promising goodies to the 1%.

[Fosse69]

Hunt is not on Hunt`s agenda anymore just a wishy washy aspiration

[For Us All]

3 hours ago, Fosse69 said:

The merit of Brexit would be a start, I doubt if the candidates know what they stand for apart from promising goodies to the 1%.

Promising another 20,000 extra cops,tougher action on drugs gangs and knives,boosting funding for education,fastnet and rail will affect more than the 1%?

[Fosse69]

Empty promises to a 1% audience, how many are voting?

[TheSage]

It's ok promising another 20,000 police officers but the government has cut 21,000 since 2010 so that's barely reversing what Johnson has voted for over the past 9 years.

I would not believe a word he says. He's a serial liar and makes it up as he goes along, when he isn't making cardboard models out of London buses.

We were going to have bendy buses, a garden bridge and he was going to lie down on the tarmac to stop Heathrow expanding. Have any of those promises been met? 

Meanwhile Hunt is trying to attract the green welly brigade and bring back fox hunting. Tally-ho. They are not called the nasty party for nothing.

[geosname]

19 minutes ago, Fosse69 said:

Empty promises to a 1% audience, how many are voting?

It's how many are listening mate..... they won't win votes on what they say but how many they appeal to.... i.e. who might win the next general election. 

[Fosse69]

Quote

An election will have a manifesto, nobody knows why the election will be called or when.  May reduced the police by 20,000, the police budget is 20% less in real terms than it was in 2010, Boris picks a number out of the air, (Ridiculed by the police today) to increase policing  mainly outside metro areas. May just as well paint it on the outside of one of his toy buses.

Reply to Geosname 21 mins ago, Quote by myself

[ginge]

Conservative Party members being investigated for Islamophobia can vote for the next prime minister

https://www.itv.com/news/2019-07-03/conservative-party-members-being-investigated-for-islamophobia-can-vote-for-the-next-prime-minister/ 

[ginge]

On 7/3/2019 at 6:08 AM, Aussie Rules said:

It's all 'Ifs and Buts'.

There was a Referendum; those who voted leave outnumbered those who voted remain

   

 

 

True, but the leave vote was split into people who wanted a deal or not. Many leading brexiteers promised we'd get a great deal and at the time majority of people who voted leave preffered a Norway type deal. Now it looks we are going towards a no deal which could break up the country. So factually the majority of people voted for our current deal (remain). That's why the first referendum of a simple leave vs remain should not have happened.

[Regal Beagle]

1 hour ago, ginge said:

True, but the leave vote was split into people who wanted a deal or not. Many leading brexiteers promised we'd get a great deal and at the time majority of people who voted leave preffered a Norway type deal. Now it looks we are going towards a no deal which could break up the country. So factually the majority of people voted for our current deal (remain). That's why the first referendum of a simple leave vs remain should not have happened. 

 

-We were lied to by the remain campaign so many people voted for remain based on lies.

-No one said how we should remain. Many remainers wanted us to remain but to change the EU so how about we start arbitrarily splitting the remain vote up like you are doing with the LEAVE vote.

17.4m is a bigger number than 16.1m. Although I know there are some people on here who won't believe that.

[Heatwave]

On 7/4/2019 at 5:48 PM, Regal Beagle said:

 

-We were lied to by the remain campaign so many people voted for remain based on lies.

-No one said how we should remain. Many remainers wanted us to remain but to change the EU so how about we start arbitrarily splitting the remain vote up like you are doing with the LEAVE vote.

17.4m is a bigger number than 16.1m. Although I know there are some people on here who won't believe that.

Can you explain which lies the Remainers told?