Portsmouth (H) match thread - 27th Jan

[Brian Johnson]

23 minutes ago, Hot Rat said:

I'm happy to be corrected if I'm wrong, but 10 lost 5 drawn and 4 won in all competitions. Not at all good admittedly. In mitigation, we had no striker on the pitch for the majority of those games, which is a reasonable quetion of the management. But still no reason to ask for the club to be put up for sale or question the motivation of the owner?

In that time, we never won a league game and we only scored 6 league goals.

I never said anything about asking the club to be put up for sale or the motivation of the owner.

I was picking out your reason why we were so poor against Portsmouth because your reasoning was that we had those 4 players missing, yet those exactly the same 4 players were part of that near three month run without a win.

 

 

[mr.hobblesworth]

Sorry to hark back to that <ovf censored> on the pitch, but does anyone know this Ted Piolunowicz? Is he really 62? 

[JohnJames]

ITV slightly embellishing the incident. 

[Wrex]

33 minutes ago, JohnJames said:

ITV slightly embellishing the incident. 

Compared to the reaction of our stewards he certainly could be classified as storming onto the pitch

[Santa]

6 minutes ago, Wrex said:

Compared to the reaction of our stewards he certainly could be classified as storming onto the pitch

Or players for that matter

[Guitar Ray]

1 hour ago, mr.hobblesworth said:

Sorry to hark back to that <ovf censored> on the pitch, but does anyone know this Ted Piolunowicz? Is he really 62? 

I think some on here have already said they know him and more or less confirmed his age.

[Playa Amodores]

1 hour ago, mr.hobblesworth said:

Sorry to hark back to that <ovf censored> on the pitch, but does anyone know this Ted Piolunowicz? Is he really 62? 

Yes, he’s been going Vale for a long time, probably 50 yrs.

[fuzzyvalefan]

On 27/01/2024 at 18:24, Valiiant said:

 

We were battered for most of the game against a side that haven't been in form. We didn't deserve a thing.

Conveniently ignoring the bit i said about us being at the bare bones, losing our target man through refereeing incompetence, having 2 clearly unfit debutants, having Loft on the pitch for an hour and haven't played in two weeks. Thought so.  A bit of balance please. Ultimately, they were the better side but we defended well and cancelled them out, unfortunately it was the Craig Hicks show and he couldn't wait to give that penalty, a competent ref would have told him to get up and if not, booked him for diving and it ends 0-0.  Do you disagree with that?

[PVFC764]

7 hours ago, Playa Amodores said:

Yes, he’s been going Vale for a long time, probably 50 yrs.

Think that "was".  Shame - he probably had enough of the ref and that moment of madness gave it all up being a Vale fan who can go to grounds and now will have to listen to the games on ifollow or Radio Sjoke.  Can't see them letting him off with a warning after the press has hyped it all up.  EFL will throw the book at Vale and want full justice for this incident.

[Conrad]

12 minutes ago, PVFC764 said:

Think that "was".  Shame - he probably had enough of the ref and that moment of madness gave it all up being a Vale fan who can go to grounds and now will have to listen to the games on ifollow or Radio Sjoke.  Can't see them letting him off with a warning after the press has hyped it all up.  EFL will throw the book at Vale and want full justice for this incident.

What is a shame is vale getting punished. Port vale were in no way to blame for this, yes ban and fine the individual but not the club.

[Hoppers]

42 minutes ago, PVFC764 said:

Think that "was".  Shame - he probably had enough of the ref and that moment of madness gave it all up being a Vale fan who can go to grounds and now will have to listen to the games on ifollow or Radio Sjoke.  Can't see them letting him off with a warning after the press has hyped it all up.  EFL will throw the book at Vale and want full justice for this incident.

Moment of madness - gave it all up being a vale fan who can go to grounds - have to listen on the radio 

Where's the punishment 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

[valiant_593]

11 hours ago, mr.hobblesworth said:

Sorry to hark back to that <ovf censored> on the pitch, but does anyone know this Ted Piolunowicz? Is he really 62? 

Yeah big vale fan home and away 

[PVFC764]

2 hours ago, Hoppers said:

Moment of madness - gave it all up being a vale fan who can go to grounds - have to listen on the radio 

Where's the punishment 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

 

Listening to the game on Radio Sjoke.  🤪

[Brian Johnson]

10 hours ago, Playa Amodores said:

Yes, he’s been going Vale for a long time, probably 50 yrs.

Not any more.

Nice of him to bow out on his 50th year.

Seem like a nice figure to go out on.

[Brian Johnson]

7 hours ago, fuzzyvalefan said:

Conveniently ignoring the bit i said about us being at the bare bones, losing our target man through refereeing incompetence, having 2 clearly unfit debutants, having Loft on the pitch for an hour and haven't played in two weeks. Thought so.  A bit of balance please. Ultimately, they were the better side but we defended well and cancelled them out, unfortunately it was the Craig Hicks show and he couldn't wait to give that penalty, a competent ref would have told him to get up and if not, booked him for diving and it ends 0-0.  Do you disagree with that?

A question for you

What happened between the 16th September and the 9th December?

Vale were awful on Saturday and deserved to lose. If Portsmouth had a little bit more composure the game would have been out of sight before they got a penalty that was a penalty.

Lets have little bit of perspective instead of looking for excuses