onevalefan.co.uk Present Past Specials About Forum
Jump to content
onevalefan.co.uk forum

Advert


Advert


Brexit again...


Davebrad

Recommended Posts

Advert

I just can't accept when people talk total b*****ks on the subject and regurgitat blatant lies. If no one challenges those views, imagine what the place would be like!

 

There's challenging views and there's talking total ******** and regurgitating blatant lies.

 

Sovereignty for example. You've been fishing for a while with that one, calling it a myth or a lie despite the very simple fact being that we do not have complete sovereignty over our Laws and policies. You can argue the extent of the lack of sovereignty, but to claim that we have it, is a complete and utter lie. No getting round that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's challenging views and there's talking total ******** and regurgitating blatant lies.

 

Sovereignty for example. You've been fishing for a while with that one, calling it a myth or a lie despite the very simple fact being that we do not have complete sovereignty over our Laws and policies. You can argue the extent of the lack of sovereignty, but to claim that we have it, is a complete and utter lie. No getting round that.

I can see your point but personally I've never had an issue with the supremacy of EU courts as we have contributed to the law making and the courts themselves. Also, as with any member state, we have never given up actual sovereignty which was demonstrated by us holding a referendum and triggering Article 50. If we were not a sovereign state we couldn't have done that by doing so would have effectively been in the same position as the US confederate states were when they cesseeded from the union as they were bound by a federal constitution and were not sovereign, thus inviting civil war as the Union did not accept rebellion against the sovereign federal state.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another point about the sovereignty issue is we have not been adversely affected by the supremacy of EU courts in 45 years of membership so promoting it as a problem by the leave side is a falsehood.

 

We're there not people we couldn't deport because of EU court rulings..... it's a question

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's challenging views and there's talking total ******** and regurgitating blatant lies.

 

Sovereignty for example. You've been fishing for a while with that one, calling it a myth or a lie despite the very simple fact being that we do not have complete sovereignty over our Laws and policies.

 

You can argue the extent of the lack of sovereignty, but to claim that we have it, is a complete and utter lie. No getting round that.

 

Name me one law the EU has forced on the UK to that affects any aspect of your or any normal person’s life? Tell me what laws you want us to make, that we would not be able too?

Most of the laws are trading laws such as fishery policies, agricultural, environmental etc which in fairness are going to happen when you join up to something like the EU.

 

Geo, yes that’s right. We’ve had hundreds of attempted deportations blocked by the EU and is something which is part of why I think it needs a reform. Equally, as we don’t have ID cards etc we make it very easy for people to be here. We don’t enforce any immigration powers we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We're there not people we couldn't deport because of EU court rulings..... it's a question

 

I think that was down to rulings regarding human rights which I don't believe is controlled by the EU it's a separate international thing. I could be mistaken though. Either way it's not a very good reason to vote to leave the EU, there's only been a handful of cases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that was down to rulings regarding human rights which I don't believe is controlled by the EU it's a separate international thing. I could be mistaken though. Either way it's not a very good reason to vote to leave the EU, there's only been a handful of cases.

 

The European court of human rights isn't controlled by Europe?

I asked the question in response to a statement about sovereignty.... which suggests that if a European court can overrule another it has sovereignty ....

Turn it around..... is the ability to overrule the UK courts a reason to stay?

The major problem with the EU, in my opinion, is that it is trying to be something it isn't, it isn't a single country with numerous states, it isn't a single state with numerous countries. It should be a number of individual countries working together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was a very interesting opinion piece in the Times yesterday by Clare Foges. It was headed "Big lie of the ‘anti establishment’ Brexit vote" and argued that the suggestion that much of the Leave voted was targetted at the "elites" and "establishment" who were seen to be out of touch with the common man.

 

She goes on to argue that those regions and groups who voted most heavily for Brexit will be those who will suffer most from its consequences. She uses the Nissan plant in Sunderland as an example of this.

 

The most telling part of the article for me though was as follows:

 

"The moneyed establishment — the rich and super-rich — may be touched by Brexit, but wealth will insulate them against real pain. As the billionaire Peter Hargreaves, who reportedly gave millions to the Leave campaign, puts it: “You say my wealth is $4.6 billion? If it wiped $4 billion off and left me $600 million it would not change my lifestyle one iota.” Indeed, according to a survey last year by UBS, most UK millionaires believe Brexit will make them even richer. If not they can always escape, like the Brexiteer and Britain’s richest man Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who recently left the promised land of Brexit for the sunnier climes of Monaco."

 

Very sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My main concern about the way things are shaping up is that the whole country could be held to ransom by a knot of unrepresentative MPs from the DUP that Teresa May needs to keep her government in office.
Good point. The unionists have always been a disproportionate problem, the only word they ever use is 'No'. Or occasionally 'Ye'. Maybe Kan-Ye West should join them, he's a big enough clown but they'd find his ethnicity something of a blocker.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Reporting Posts and other information

    Rules - This forum is moderated but the admin team don't read everything. Don't assume we'll spot rule breaking and alert us by reporting content. Logged in users can hover over the post and click the orange button. Guests can contact us here. If you don't get on with another user you can "ignore" them. Click this link, type in their username and click save. Please check with the admin team if you wish to sell/auction any items. We're happy to support good causes but check first.

    Use - This forum may not be suitable for all as it may contain words or phrases not considered appropriate for some. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and could face legal action should it contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. Please do not reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: phone number, address or email address). This forum is not in any way affiliated with Port Vale FC. OVF reserve the right to edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason. If you spot an offensive post please report it to the admin team (instructions are above).

    Adverts - This site occasionally a) has adverts and sponsored features about gambling b) accepts sponsored posts from third parties. If you require help and advice on gambling read these links: Information on protecting young people | Addiction help from gambleaware.co.uk
  • Friends of OVF


Advert



×
×
  • Create New...