1 hour ago, werstayinup said:

Maybe it's just me and yes he can look clumsy but Faal is more mobile than Stockley and currently has more goals so i guess that will be why he gets in and he hasn't done to bad the last couple of times he has come on,only my opinion of course.

This team should be enough to see these off(easier said than done i know) but if we dont then something is wrong

Some fans have to have a goat to scape!

Confused philpvfc? - it means scapegoat!

Edited November 2, 2025Nov 2 by LancyTony
Extra comment

On 01/11/2025 at 15:25, WV said:

. 5-1 Vale. Them to score first to get the traffic up on here. 

This prediction might have been too conservative 

Special mention to Ruari Paton.

Put through the wringer in all sorts of ways over the last season and a bit, but never lost confidence in his own abilities.

And now is making it impossible for Darren not to include him on a regular basis.

Miles offside too

Just now, Alan Vit said:

And now is making it impossible for Darren not to include him on a regular basis.

Next match bet DM drops him and we all think how is he dropped.

Would love to see Ruari have as many shots as he possibly can come second half and just take the pizz

5 minutes ago, Nippy Naylor said:

Paton is the best finisher at the club 

And all those who said he never looks like scoring can f#ck of and go eat humble pie

Darren should stop fu#ckin

about with team selections 

And Stockley shud be on instead of Faal

Don’t think he’s the best finisher, I’d give Cole that honour but he is our best striker, should be first pick on our front line

4 minutes ago, Nippy Naylor said:

Darren should stop fu#ckin

about with team selections 

You should stop fu#ckin about on this site and instead go and constructively support your own team.

Debrah 🫠

4 minutes ago, WV said:

This prediction might have been too conservative 

70/1 both teams to score and 8 goals or more is looking good. 

Great that certain players have got goals, but let’s not get too carried away, look at the level of opposition we’re up against. It’s a bit false really because it’s going to be like a practice game now. 

What a <ovf censored> throwing himself to the ground like that because he knows he was beaten 🤣 

1 minute ago, Powerline said:

Not sure how that makes sense. The back 3 was horrendous. Debrah was the worst. I’m not really sure how it makes sense to let them all keep their place. And if you drop one it should be the worst performing one, which was imo Debrah against Stockport. I agree other players should’ve been dropped. I would’ve dropped Byers as well for instance.

It makes sense because look like you have already said we only have 1 replacement. Only 6 teams in the whole division have conceded less than us and 4 of those are currently sitting in the playoffs. If he was making mistakes week in week out or putting in subpar performances week in week out you would have a point, he had a shocker against the best team in the league, for me that's not a cause for being dropped.

Having to listen on audio. I can hear Walters involved in a lot but not Byers is that a fair reflection if anyone is watching

1 minute ago, NTVALE said:

It makes sense because look like you have already said we only have 1 replacement. Only 6 teams in the whole division have conceded less than us and 4 of those are currently sitting in the playoffs. If he was making mistakes week in week out or putting in subpar performances week in week out you would have a point, he had a shocker against the best team in the league, for me that's not a cause for being dropped.

The reason we don’t concede many isn’t because our defence have excelled though, it’s how we set up. If you don’t drop someone after a performance like that then he will never get dropped