1 minute ago, Doha said:

How can that possibly be only a yellow?

If he’s seen it,it’s red. If not, he can’t give anything. Illogical

Just now, Conrad said:

So the liner must have seen that for the ref to show a card, the law of the game say that’s a straight red.

It’s either no foul & no card or it’s a red 🤷‍♂️ 

It was as clear a red card as you need. Regardless how the officials saw it, if they saw it - it was Red. I dont think the liner saw it, and fudged a yellow. It's either nothing or it's red. What's the yellow actually for? 

Two assaults on Vale players and one yellow card- proof positive if ever we needed it that we get absolutely nowt from refs. 

1 minute ago, boleyuk said:

 What's the yellow actually for? 

To wind you up

1 minute ago, VTID-New said:

It’s either no foul & no card or it’s a red 🤷‍♂️ 

Exactly,that’s what I was trying to say 

It’s laughing his gob off after the yellow that got me 😡

Once again, the standard of referees at this level is so feeble. How can another player lash out and hit his opponent in the face and not be sent off? 

Get Sang off he’s having a stinker. Hope this ages like Curtis the other week 🙏🏻 

Crewe late winner incoming. 

Looked like the most clear red I’ve seen. The one decision it couldn’t have been was a bloody yellow 

Sang is getting roasted on that flank!

Just now, Brian Johnson said:

To wind you up

Not winding me up, what a strange interpretation of my comment youve made. I'd be interested which one of the laws is breached makes it a yellow.

1 minute ago, Conrad said:

Exactly,that’s what I was trying to say 

Completely bottled it 

1 minute ago, boleyuk said:

Not winding me up, what a strange interpretation of my comment youve made. I'd be interested which one of the laws is breached makes it a yellow.

I was messing