6 hours ago, Brian Johnson said:

Where's the rumour come from that he' asked to speak to Charlton.

My understanding that Charlton made the approach first to Vale who then gave him permission to speak to them and not from Uche which means he is due his balance

I have never known a player to be transferred and the club has to pay up his contract. I just can't see how that could happen. Charlton come in for Uche, Vale agree to let him speak to them, then he goes and we pay a salary for a player we don't have. It's financial madness. Why would we agree to let a player move on if we still have to pay for him. Not having any of that.

1 hour ago, Vale1995 said:

Am i reading this right? 
people think when a player leaves because another team has brought them they think the original club still has to pay their wages? 
 

that is complete an utter crap if uche left vale wouldn't have to pay a penny more to him. He in affect is terminating his contract with us to sign a new contract with a new club.

 

 

1 hour ago, Vale1995 said:

Am i reading this right? 
people think when a player leaves because another team has brought them they think the original club still has to pay their wages? 
 

that is complete an utter crap if uche left vale wouldn't have to pay a penny more to him. He in affect is terminating his contract with us to sign a new contract with a new club.

The internet unfortunately gives a voice to those who would have been considered the village idiot. I just didn’t respond to it .. but as you have ! It is utter cra9

Edited January 21, 20242 yr by dazzerjames

1 hour ago, Vale1995 said:

Am i reading this right? 
people think when a player leaves because another team has brought them they think the original club still has to pay their wages? 
 

that is complete an utter crap if uche left vale wouldn't have to pay a penny more to him. He in affect is terminating his contract with us to sign a new contract with a new club.

Where loan deals are made the club loaning may stand some of the wages. There are two situations. Loaning for experience. Loaning out a temporarily unwanted player. 

Edited January 21, 20242 yr by Warren

2 hours ago, Vtid said:

Just heard Chislet is off to Ipswich! 🤦🏼‍♂️ 

Is that from a reliable source ?  🙄 

6 hours ago, Brian Johnson said:

Where's the rumour come from that he' asked to speak to Charlton.

My understanding that Charlton made the approach first to Vale who then gave him permission to speak to them and not from Uche which means he is due his balance

Absolute crap mate in no way is this a thing . Its mental how you believe it to be. 
 

so he can move club but get two wages? 

8 minutes ago, mbycars said:

I have never known a player to be transferred and the club has to pay up his contract. I just can't see how that could happen. Charlton come in for Uche, Vale agree to let him speak to them, then he goes and we pay a salary for a player we don't have. It's financial madness. Why would we agree to let a player move on if we still have to pay for him. Not having any of that.

It is absolutely true though. The player could turn around and say I didn’t ask to leave, but you’ve agreed a fee (or he’s told he can leave for nothing because they want him out), so he asks for  a percentage of his wages. It is genuine. 

Edited January 21, 20242 yr by PV1973

1 hour ago, Vale1995 said:

Am i reading this right? 
people think when a player leaves because another team has brought them they think the original club still has to pay their wages? 
 

that is complete an utter crap if uche left vale wouldn't have to pay a penny more to him. He in affect is terminating his contract with us to sign a new contract with a new club.

100% correct but some on here think differently for some reason. If this were the case players would want to be transferred 4 times a season! 

10 minutes ago, MBE said:

Yesterday Appleton confirmed Uche will not be joining Charlton.

Today Appleton rumoured to be sacked tomorrow.

Football eh.,,,

Yep , it's a funny old game 😆

Uche is under contract, registered by us. He can break the contract, but then he wont play for anyone, unless we agree.

Re the nonsense that we agreed a fee and he can get the balance of wages while still been paid by us. Some weird folk out there.

 

 

 

22 hours ago, osprey said:

Is he a striker? 

Don't know,  but apparently,  he's on fire at the moment 

20 minutes ago, Nippy Naylor said:

Is that from a reliable source ?  🙄 

No it’s not from osh.

36 minutes ago, mbycars said:

I have never known a player to be transferred and the club has to pay up his contract. I just can't see how that could happen. Charlton come in for Uche, Vale agree to let him speak to them, then he goes and we pay a salary for a player we don't have. It's financial madness. Why would we agree to let a player move on if we still have to pay for him. Not having any of that.

It’s certainly a poser BJ has been so adamant about being correct regarding footballer contracts, he must be in the know.  Do clubs just add what is owed for the remainder of a contract to a player’s transfer fee?  There’s always talk about selling players to get their wages ‘off the books’ to save money, how does that work if a club has to pay up what’s left on their contract anyways, if they choose to leave?

Manchester United have agreed to send Dan Gore on loan to League One side Port Vale for the remainder of the season. The 19-year-old is eager to experience his first proper taste of professional football, with his exit set to be formalised sometime early next week.

The Manchester Evening News understands there was extensive loan interest shown in Gore this month, but Port Vale have offered the best assurances of regular football at a competitive level for the remainder of the campaign.

22 hours ago, Doha said:

No comment!

 

Barcelona plotting surprise transfer raid for untested League One wonderkid - Mirror Online

WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK

 

Straight in to their first team. They started with two sixteen year olds tonight.

52 minutes ago, Trumpingtonvale said:

It’s certainly a poser BJ has been so adamant about being correct regarding footballer contracts, he must be in the know.  Do clubs just add what is owed for the remainder of a contract to a player’s transfer fee?  There’s always talk about selling players to get their wages ‘off the books’ to save money, how does that work if a club has to pay up what’s left on their contract anyways, if they choose to leave?

It doesn't work it's absolutel tripe. A player leaving means they leave there contract from their current club and sign one with the new employers It is absolutely bonkers to think otherwise. 
 

look at the premier league they sell players to get them off their wage bill for ffp. Why woild they do that if they still had to pay them 😂😂😂 seem some mental things on this site but people believing we have to pay people for leaving is crazy