onevalefan.co.uk Present Past Specials About Forum
Jump to content
onevalefan.co.uk forum

Advert


Advert


Deakin


CAVALIER

Recommended Posts

Advert

Not read all 9 pages but 2 things;

 

1. Bratt, we were informed, was going when Blue Sky signed and Deakin said he had a letter from Bratt to that effect. When questionned on this Mike Lloyd stammered his way through his answer as to why Bratt hadn't gone. More lies from Deakin and Lloyd.

 

2. I said weeks ago that Bratt wouldn't go as something wouldnt be right with this deal and now it appears he isn't.

 

I'm fedup with our club being run by liars and people looking after their own ends, it stinks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

why not? because there is a good deal in bluessky on the table and he sees the club going forwards? because he knows the ins and outs of the club and sees it as a good investment?

 

you question everything but will never know the answers. WHY? because you are a football supporter and you have no standing in the club other than the right to attend and pay money. It is your decision to take an interest in Vale or not. If you don't like it, **** off.

 

NLV man was offered a place on the board and he turned it down. If you demand to know why you don't know the answers to your questions, he's your man to blame

 

Wrong! we do have a right to ask questions of a board who have a vote of no confidence against them.

Where is the £100K going any ideas ? ...

 

'' if you dont like it, **** off '' does not sound very good buisness sense to me did you work for ROVER or Woolworths ? ....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest thecharlatans
Not read all 9 pages but 2 things;

 

1. Bratt, we were informed, was going when Blue Sky signed and Deakin said he had a letter from Bratt to that effect. When questionned on this Mike Lloyd stammered his way through his answer as to why Bratt hadn't gone. More lies from Deakin and Lloyd.

 

2. I said weeks ago that Bratt wouldn't go as something wouldnt be right with this deal and now it appears he isn't.

 

I'm fedup with our club being run by liars and people looking after their own ends, it stinks.

 

bratt will be gone within the next 4 weeks. Problems for you with that? You have nothing left to moan about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only problem i've got with this is i thought Bratt was supposed to stepping down as part of the blue sky deal, now it seems dependant on deakin being on the board.

Dont have a problem with deakin being a director and ceo,the difference with bratt is, he was chairman and ceo and a pretty useless ceo at that.

If BB and GO leave that leaves ML and MA, Adams has stated he wants to step down, which leaves ML. 3 short of the qourum.

so 3 more are needed,deakin, hank the yank, and the other maybe mark sims[hopefully]

We need to cut some slack somewhere along the line or this will never be sorted.

As i said, the only concern is the fact that bratt was meant to step down on completion of the blue sky deal, not deakin's directorship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest thecharlatans
and you skirt around the fact that you do not even attend games..........again

 

i attend more games than you.

 

bye bye black n gold ======:D:D:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not read all 9 pages but 2 things;

 

1. Bratt, we were informed, was going when Blue Sky signed and Deakin said he had a letter from Bratt to that effect. When questionned on this Mike Lloyd stammered his way through his answer as to why Bratt hadn't gone. More lies from Deakin and Lloyd.

 

2. I said weeks ago that Bratt wouldn't go as something wouldnt be right with this deal and now it appears he isn't.

 

I'm fedup with our club being run by liars and people looking after their own ends, it stinks.

 

I have not read all 9 pages either, but I am puzzled as to how that conclusion is reached.

 

We are all conditioned to think that there is a hidden and evil agenda behind every move.

 

When (not if) Bill Bratt goes, he needs to be replaced. Perhaps this move is one which the new investor thought would be better than having two American based directors added to the board. Or maybe even that it would be necessary if there were US based directors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would just like to put on record my thanks to Mr Bratt for the following

 

1, tripling of the clubs debt

2, lowest league position in over 25 years

3, setting a record for worst ever FA cup defeat

4, appointing 2 of the possibly most hated managers in the clubs history

5, the rejection of record investment into the club ( not reliant on grants/loans etc)

6, caught out telling "untruths"on local radio

7, splitting the fanbase (something that I never thought would happen and fear will never be repaired)

8, providing a creche

 

as GO said, Ive never had it so good......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have not read all 9 pages either, but I am puzzled as to how that conclusion is reached.

 

We are all conditioned to think that there is a hidden and evil agenda behind every move.

 

When (not if) Bill Bratt goes, he needs to be replaced. Perhaps this move is one which the new investor thought would be better than having two American based directors added to the board. Or maybe even that it would be necessary if there were US based directors?

 

Tone, we were told by Deakin that Bratt would be going "as soon as the Blue Sky investment was signed" and he had a letter from Bratt to confirm that. Matt Sandos quizzed Lloyd on this very point and asked why Bratt had not gone, Lloyd could not give a straight answer and showed the signs of a man who was lying. We were also told a blue sky rep would be replacing Bratt on the board so why does Deakin have to?

 

So no suspected evil or hidden agenda theory, just going off what has been said and been in the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Money into the club and Bratt gone?

 

I realise he may not be everyone cup of tea but ice been quite impressed by Deakin. I think he's done some good things in his time here so far.

 

whats his return ? we dont know his motives

 

does he think tesco is missing a store between hanley & kidsgrove

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Reporting Posts and other information

    Rules - This forum is moderated but the admin team don't read everything. Don't assume we'll spot rule breaking and alert us by reporting content. Logged in users can hover over the post and click the orange button. Guests can contact us here. If you don't get on with another user you can "ignore" them. Click this link, type in their username and click save. Please check with the admin team if you wish to sell/auction any items. We're happy to support good causes but check first.

    Use - This forum may not be suitable for all as it may contain words or phrases not considered appropriate for some. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and could face legal action should it contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. Please do not reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: phone number, address or email address). This forum is not in any way affiliated with Port Vale FC. OVF reserve the right to edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason. If you spot an offensive post please report it to the admin team (instructions are above).

    Adverts - This site occasionally a) has adverts and sponsored features about gambling b) accepts sponsored posts from third parties. If you require help and advice on gambling read these links: Information on protecting young people | Addiction help from gambleaware.co.uk
  • Friends of OVF


Advert



×
×
  • Create New...