Brexit again...

[Regal Beagle]

6 minutes ago, Nofinikea said:

They have explained this loads of times in the last 24 hours.  Either you are not listening or you are thick.

I'm waiting for someone to actually tell me the truth. Although come to think of it, remainers telling the truth? Maybe I am thick after all.

[Fosse69]

6 minutes ago, Regal Beagle said:

I'm waiting for someone to actually tell me the truth. Although come to think of it, remainers telling the truth? Maybe I am thick after all.

Explain why Johnson is saying he did not sack all the rebels, it was the Chief Whip that did it. Who is in charge? Removing a whip and stopping them from standing  again is surely beyond the Chief Whips powers?  22 Committee having a ball.

[Fosse69]

Mays Bill back on the table, so Irish border OK then?

[Regal Beagle]

9 minutes ago, Nofinikea said:

That must feel like a weight lifted.

I'm only joking, I've known for a long time that remainers have a complete disdain for the truth.

Where are all the staunch democracy fans we had last week? Another U-turn by the looks of it. They were democracy fans for about 48 hours but now they've dropped that like it's hot.

[Regal Beagle]

17 minutes ago, Fosse69 said:

Explain why Johnson is saying he did not sack all the rebels, it was the Chief Whip that did it. Who is in charge? Removing a whip and stopping them from standing  again is surely beyond the Chief Whips powers?  22 Committee having a ball.

Who is in charge? The aggresive minority? The EU?  Dominic Cummings?

Not sure what you are trying to get at with that question to be honest.

[Fosse69]

1 minute ago, Regal Beagle said:

Who is in charge? The aggresive minority? The EU?  Dominic Cummings?

Not sure what you are trying to get at with that question to be honest.

Situation in the 22 committee

[Regal Beagle]

2 minutes ago, Nofinikea said:

What's undemocratic about the elected house taking votes?

Nothing.

What's democratic about blocking a General Election whilst lying through your teeth about being the pro-democracy choice?

 

[Regal Beagle]

3 minutes ago, Nofinikea said:

Really?  You dont understand that? 

I don't really get why I'm personally getting questioned about the 1922 committee no.

Feel free to shed any light on it?

[Fosse69]

3 minutes ago, Regal Beagle said:

I don't really get why I'm personally getting questioned about the 1922 committee no.

Feel free to shed any light on it?

As much light as Johnson shines

[Jacko51]

2 hours ago, For Us All said:

It was,remember Article 50?

Parliament voted through Article 50.  Parliament has now changed its mind.  It is allowed to do that.

[Regal Beagle]

2 minutes ago, Jacko51 said:

Parliament voted through Article 50.  Parliament has now changed its mind.  It is allowed to do that.

Sounds like we need a general election. How can the public trust a parliament that don't know what they are voting for?

[Fosse69]

1 minute ago, Jacko51 said:

Parliament voted through Article 50.  Parliament has now changed its mind.  It is allowed to do that.

It apparently wants to debate Mays deal again now as part of the no deal bill amendments, to coin a phrase. you could not make it up

.Ah well onto the election debate.

[Regal Beagle]

5 minutes ago, Fosse69 said:

As much light as Johnson shines

Well that makes absolutely no sense.

[Fosse69]

1 minute ago, Regal Beagle said:

Well that makes absolutely no sense.

Like your question on knowledge of election tactics

[Jacko51]

1 hour ago, For Us All said:

 

Sorry Miss.😲

Correct me if I'm wrong but the deal on the table was a withdrawal agreement that's been rejected three times by parliament.It was that bad even the Remainers didn't want it.

The EU have said that's it and they will not renegotiate that withdrawal agreement.

So it looks like the EU stance is take it or leave it?

Am I right so far?

You want a deal,I want a deal and even Boris wants a deal but it doesn't count for anything if the the EU won't play ball.

You can perhaps understand why Cummings has come to that decision.

You need two to tango.

 

 

Two tangoed.  We had a deal.  It's possible it might be presented again I believe.  On the three previous occasions the majority against it reduced each time.  Johnson voted in favour of it last time.  Gove voted in favour of it all three times.  If Johnson votes for it again and any of his party vote against it will they be denied the whip?