Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

onevalefan.co.uk forum

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Advert

Chesterfield v Port Vale match thread - 25th Jan

Featured Replies

29 minutes ago, werstayinup said:

Why would it? either way I think he will put John there and have Smith or Sang on the right of a back 3

Whenever Sang has played RWB he's struggled that's why it's not rocket science 

Advert




1 minute ago, Guppys left peg said:

I don’t know what you were looking at in all honesty. We kept two forwards on the pitch for the duration. When you’re down to 10 against a decent opponent you’re always going to be on the back foot and we showed we could dig in. I also don’t follow the notion we have the best attacking players in the league. Based on what?

Chesterfield have done a right number on away fans putting them in that stand as the sun was right in our eyes first half before it finally set. Fair play to them.

I would like to know who all these players are we have out

Just now, Spireite till i die said:

I would like to know who all these players are we have out

I know you have had injury issues previously (same here) but looked a pretty strong Chesterfield team to me. One which while we had a full compliment we matched up pretty well with I thought at least.

1 hour ago, philpvfc said:

Ooh what a <ovf censored>

Ooh what a total c0ck you are

Happy with the effort from the lads a lot better, disappointed that Moore did not use more subs with playing with ten men for so long.  Hopefully better result next game.

Advert




6 minutes ago, Guppys left peg said:

I don’t know what you were looking at in all honesty. We kept two forwards on the pitch for the duration. When you’re down to 10 against a decent opponent you’re always going to be on the back foot and we showed we could dig in. I also don’t follow the notion we have the best attacking players in the league. Based on what?

Chesterfield have done a right number on away fans putting them in that stand as the sun was right in our eyes first half before it finally set. Fair play to them.

You said Port Vale had a weak mentality because chesterfield had numerous players out and you didn't attack us, so we haven't got injuries apart from Will Grigg so Port Vales mentality wasn't weak

40 minutes ago, mbycars said:

Jesus Phil you criticise the manager for not bringing on attacking subs, then you criticise him for keeping two attacking players on and not taking them off for one attacker. Can't work that one out. Not Moore's fault we didn't win that. Two mistakes by Mitch and Tom who otherwise had good games was the reason we didn't win.

No there centre half is 37 surely we stretch him with umolias pace as soon as Clark got sent off ,I would have bought Byers on for Tolaj  Palace lad for Stockley .

Very decent point I'm just livid at goal given away, and the sending off as he was our best player up till then I was hearing along with Headley and looked like Amos who saved well a few times .

A points good but if we started game at 110 miles a hr why couldn't we sustain it the ref giving thst terrible decision has turned a win into a draw good job we didn't lose I'd be wanting know where he lives the ref clown 

 

 

 

Edited by Dipepa delight

6 minutes ago, Guppys left peg said:

I know you have had injury issues previously (same here) but looked a pretty strong Chesterfield team to me. One which while we had a full compliment we matched up pretty well with I thought at least.

We have only got Grigg out so the port vale fans who are saying they should beat us easily cos we have a load of players out are doing it to make the result look like a bad result against a side ravaged by injuries so they can attack Daren Moore

1 minute ago, Spireite till i die said:

We have only got Grigg out so the port vale fans who are saying they should beat us easily cos we have a load of players out are doing it to make the result look like a bad result against a side ravaged by injuries so they can attack Daren Moore

A worse result considering the absolutely outrageous sending off

Genuinthe worst I've ever seen

1 minute ago, Spireite till i die said:

We have only got Grigg out so the port vale fans who are saying they should beat us easily cos we have a load of players out are doing it to make the result look like a bad result against a side ravaged by injuries so they can attack Daren Moore

Genuine question, but I thought you had injuries, had sold a few players & we’re light on CB’s??

Advert




3 minutes ago, Spireite till i die said:

We have only got Grigg out so the port vale fans who are saying they should beat us easily cos we have a load of players out are doing it to make the result look like a bad result against a side ravaged by injuries so they can attack Daren Moore

A worse result considering the absolutely outrageous sending off

Genuintley the worst I've ever seen

Edited by eh up nah

Just now, eh up nah said:

A worse result considering the absolutely outrageous sending off

Genuinthe worst I've ever seen

The sending off i am waiting to see it on screen, you will go up automatic

5 minutes ago, Spireite till i die said:

You said Port Vale had a weak mentality because chesterfield had numerous players out and you didn't attack us, so we haven't got injuries apart from Will Grigg so Port Vales mentality wasn't weak

I think you quoted the wrong person there mate as I certainly haven’t said that.

6 minutes ago, Dipepa delight said:

No there centre half is 37 surely we stretch him with Hackfords pace as soon as Clark got sent off ,I would have bought Byers on for Tolaj and Hackford or Palace lad for Stockley .

Very decent point I'm just livid at goal given away, and the sending off as he was our best player up till then I was hearing along with Headley and looked like Amos who saved well a few times .

A points good but if we started game at 110 miles a hr why couldn't we sustain it the ref giving thst terrible decision has turned a win into a draw good job we didn't lose I'd be wanting know where he lives the ref clown 

 

 

 

Hackford wasn’t on the bench so that wasn’t an option. How can you be bemoaning supposed negativity (which I disagree with) then almost in the same breath complain about the goal given away. It was a mental error from someone who was otherwise very good. It happens.

Just now, Spireite till i die said:

The sending off i am waiting to see it on screen, you will go up automatic

Honestly mate, ludicrous 

I hope you're right

All the best to you pal 👍 

Great result at the end of the day. Players battled and defended well second half. One bad decision by sang. And one by Clark. I'd give everyone 10/10 for commitment, bar Clark and Sang, for his mistake.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Reporting posts and important forum information

  • Reporting posts: this forum is moderated but the admin team don't read everything. Don't assume we'll spot rule breaking and alert us by reporting content. Logged in users can hover over the post and click the report button. Guests can contact us here.

  • Ignoring users: if you don't get on with another user you can "ignore" them. Click this link, type in their username and click save.

  • Selling/auctioning items: please check with the admin team if you wish to sell/auction any items. We're usually happy to support good causes but check first.

  • Usage, liability, bans & content removal: messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of this website. This forum may not be suitable for all as it may contain words or phrases not considered appropriate for some. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and could face legal action should it contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. Please do not reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: phone number, address or email address). This forum and website are independent and are not in any way affiliated with Port Vale FC or the Supporters Club. OVF reserve the right to ban users and/or edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason.

  • Advertising policy: this site occasionally a) has adverts and sponsored features about gambling b) accepts sponsored posts from third parties. The content of third party sponsored posts are not neccessarily the views of this website. OVF only supports responsible gambling sites with gambling controls. However, if you do require help and advice on gambling read these links: Information on protecting young people and Addiction help from gambleaware.co.uk

The above is a summary of our key rules and instructions. Please do read the full rules and terms & conditions.



Our full forum rules are here

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.