onevalefan.co.uk Present Past Specials About Forum
Jump to content
onevalefan.co.uk forum

Advert


Advert


Ukip


For Us All

Recommended Posts

Advert

If you are good enough and work hard enough and desire it enough there are opportunities out there..

 

I do think all is possible but social mobility has been made harder..I look at the obvious example of student loans and tuition fees. I paid no fees and cos my parents had no money and very little income I got a full student grant (no loans) which i am eternally grateful for; not sure what I would have done had I been embarking on a path that would have meant tens of thousands of debt.

 

But harder does not mean impossible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The torys are not to the middle right or left they introduced the Bedroom Tax and made it impossible for people to live on their sanctions and unfair work for benefit policies. Theyhate the working class end of.

 

Personally in principle the so called 'bedroom tax' is a sound idea but the way it's been implemented is grossly unfair

 

Take my own Mum for example...found herself living alone in a 3 bed council house in 1987 until 2010 (having moved their in the late 50s). She had all that space whilst elsewhere on Norton estate families were crammed into 2 bed flats (and others in B&B accommodation). The policy of getting people such as my Mum to downsize to free up such larger housing for those in need is absolutley sound (horrible though it would have been for my Mum to have to move).

 

However implementing it by taking away benefits is not the way to achieve this; there has to be a better/fairer way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He said they moved to the left not that they were left wing.

 

Taxing adults individually has its merits. My parents were working class for instance, fought their way up through education and deducation, built a fantastic property when others chose to spend their incomes in different ways on booze, fags, holidays etc and yet were penalised under tax for investing their income in their family's future rather than choosing to fritter it away. That never struck me as fair growing up.

 

Your parents strike me as hardworking but extremely lucky parents. ,many who are hard working cannot even get onto the property ladder let alone build their own property.

 

It is a dream for some to have a roof over their head that they can call their own. Many people who work do not 'spend all their money on booze and fags' these people you talk of are usually people who do not work and cannot be bothered to work. They are in a very small minority.

 

Taxation on inheritance tax will be abolished under UKIP so that is one good point for you to consider when going to the polls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rather have Unions than no unions at all-

 

Totally agree

 

This country has simply since the Thatcher years been 'them and us' and that needs to change WE need to change as a country.

 

The counter argument is that it's employees who bang on about workers and bosses and see this great separation instead of seeing themselves as part of one workforce, one organisation striving to make the organisation successful.

 

Them and us was around long before Mrs T

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do think all is possible but social mobility has been made harder..I look at the obvious example of student loans and tuition fees. I paid no fees and cos my parents had no money and very little income I got a full student grant (no loans) which i am eternally grateful for; not sure what I would have done had I been embarking on a path that would have meant tens of thousands of debt.

 

But harder does not mean impossible

 

 

They should abolish tuition fees and raise income taxes for the top 20% earners in the country- the tories wont do this- brown envelopes in exchange for harsh policies. How can the tories say they back people who are prepared to work hard when many cannot afford the neccesary education?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally in principle the so called 'bedroom tax' is a sound idea but the way it's been implemented is grossly unfair

 

Take my own Mum for example...found herself living alone in a 3 bed council house in 1987 until 2010 (having moved their in the late 50s). She had all that space whilst elsewhere on Norton estate families were crammed into 2 bed flats (and others in B&B accommodation). The policy of getting people such as my Mum to downsize to free up such larger housing for those in need is absolutley sound (horrible though it would have been for my Mum to have to move).

 

However implementing it by taking away benefits is not the way to achieve this; there has to be a better/fairer way.

 

There would have been a far fairer outlook had people actually been offered suitable alternatve accomodation by the council- it is after all, their responsibility to ensure housing is utilised in the correct way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They should abolish tuition fees

 

Ideally yes

 

and raise income taxes for the top 20% earners in the country- the tories wont do this- brown envelopes in exchange for harsh policies.

 

Personally I am in favour of a flat rate of tax so i can't support that. The top 20% will always pay more tax

 

How can the tories say they back people who are prepared to work hard when many cannot afford the neccesary education?

 

They can aford it..they just end up in debt to pay for it..sometimes you have to invest in yourself. Plus remember it was Labour who introduced tuition fees and increased them in 2004..although it was the conservatives who introdued loans in 1989 it was Labour that took them thru the stratosphere by putting fees into the equation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There would have been a far fairer outlook had people actually been offered suitable alternatve accomodation by the council- it is after all, their responsibility to ensure housing is utilised in the correct way.

 

Indeed.

 

Had people been offered suitable downsized housing and turned it down then perhaps consider benefit reduction. The current method of impolementation is flawed, unfair, too rigid and ignores the lack of availability of suitable accommodation in many areas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Reporting Posts and other information

    Rules - This forum is moderated but the admin team don't read everything. Don't assume we'll spot rule breaking and alert us by reporting content. Logged in users can hover over the post and click the orange button. Guests can contact us here. If you don't get on with another user you can "ignore" them. Click this link, type in their username and click save. Please check with the admin team if you wish to sell/auction any items. We're happy to support good causes but check first.

    Use - This forum may not be suitable for all as it may contain words or phrases not considered appropriate for some. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and could face legal action should it contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. Please do not reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: phone number, address or email address). This forum is not in any way affiliated with Port Vale FC. OVF reserve the right to edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason. If you spot an offensive post please report it to the admin team (instructions are above).

    Adverts - This site occasionally a) has adverts and sponsored features about gambling b) accepts sponsored posts from third parties. If you require help and advice on gambling read these links: Information on protecting young people | Addiction help from gambleaware.co.uk
  • Friends of OVF


Advert



×
×
  • Create New...