onevalefan.co.uk Present Past Specials About Forum
Jump to content
onevalefan.co.uk forum

Advert


Advert


Season ticket is a no go at the moment


ValeMadrid87

Recommended Posts

Guest TommyMac
Wouldnt that be wasting money paying off Oliver.Lloyd,Meigh.Why pay them off more when all he would need to do is pay them off same as any other share holder is paid for their share's?

 

To gain 100% control he would have had to purchase every share, i.e. those from the ex directors and all other shareholders (the fans). Without admin he would also have inherited all the club's debts. I'm not saying I'm right but if/when the takeover occurs, Keith has 100% ownership of the club at a fraction of the cost.

 

I also believe that if MOLD had been ousted via the EGM it would have been very diificult for Keith Ryder to have purchased the club. Rightly or wrongly it seemed to me that the interim board proposed by the supporters club would not have taken us into administration IMO, and I'm on the outside looking in, there was a wave of support for Mo Chaudry (possibly with others) to save the club.

 

If I'm right and I stress it's only a suspicion, Keith has the club 'on the cheap', Oliver, Lloyd and Meigh got their money back and perhaps most importantly to Glenn ("over my dead body") Oliver, Mo Chaudry is kept well away from the club.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advert

To gain 100% control he would have had to purchase every share, i.e. those from the ex directors and all other shareholders (the fans). Without admin he would also have inherited all the club's debts. I'm not saying I'm right but if/when the takeover occurs, Keith has 100% ownership of the club at a fraction of the cost.

 

I also believe that if MOLD had been ousted via the EGM it would have been very diificult for Keith Ryder to have purchased the club. Rightly or wrongly it seemed to me that the interim board proposed by the supporters club would not have taken us into administration IMO, and I'm on the outside looking in, there was a wave of support for Mo Chaudry (possibly with others) to save the club.

 

If I'm right and I stress it's only a suspicion, Keith has the club 'on the cheap', Oliver, Lloyd and Meigh got their money back and perhaps most importantly to Glenn ("over my dead body") Oliver, Mo Chaudry is kept well away from the club.

 

Are all shares no non existent?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thought opinions would have changed now that MOLD have gone .........WRONG.....SEO has finished, MOLD are finished ...... you wont be going to the vale because you are a true fan. Your decisions are based on the long term future of the club ???????? what decision, wether you are a vale fan or not.

 

As i see it,a fair few of us didn't go last season because of MOLD and said that was the reason,well MOLD have gone and i have my ticket,i do now think that people are after the slightest reason to not go now,family or work reasons fair enough but to say now it's because we are **** etc..,bloomin ada we have watched **** for many years now moaned about it but still supported our team.SEO was to get rid of those ****ers and we did that,so come on we got what we wanted didn't we?. Just for the record i am not one who will say if you dont go then you aint a fan because that is total ******** and anyone who says that hasn't got a clue really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TommyMac

Melv, I think you are correct that creditors will receive 3p in the £ as per the CVA. Now if something has gone on behind the scenes to 'engineer' administration and Keith's takeover, is it possible Keith came to some agreement with Oliver, Lloyd and Meigh that would see them recoup their investment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TommyMac

Jean, I have no evidence whatsoever. It's purely a suspicion I have and, to be honest, all I'm basing it on is:

 

The previous dealing and loan/investment of £100,000.

Mike Lloyd's eager 'endorsement of Keith Ryder when he became the preferred bidder.

Hearing nothing from Oliver, Lloyd or Meigh regarding the substantial sums of money they have lost.

 

I'm probably reading too much into this but I can't rid these thoughts that ex directors may have come out of all this with more than any other creditor/shareholder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jean, I have no evidence whatsoever. It's purely a suspicion I have and, to be honest, all I'm basing it on is:

 

The previous dealing and loan/investment of £100,000.

Mike Lloyd's eager 'endorsement of Keith Ryder when he became the preferred bidder.

Hearing nothing from Oliver, Lloyd or Meigh regarding the substantial sums of money they have lost.

 

I'm probably reading too much into this but I can't rid these thoughts that ex directors may have come out of all this with more than any other creditor/shareholder.

 

We best hope that its nothing more than your mind leading you astray,suspicion,conspiracy call it what ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jean, I have no evidence whatsoever. It's purely a suspicion I have and, to be honest, all I'm basing it on is:

 

The previous dealing and loan/investment of £100,000.

Mike Lloyd's eager 'endorsement of Keith Ryder when he became the preferred bidder.

Hearing nothing from Oliver, Lloyd or Meigh regarding the substantial sums of money they have lost.

 

I'm probably reading too much into this but I can't rid these thoughts that ex directors may have come out of all this with more than any other creditor/shareholder.

 

Which would surely be a clear breach of their fiduciary duties and a gigantic risk to take once the takeover is complete and the Administrators morph into Insolvency Practitioners and start lifiting the drains??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TommyMac
Which would surely be a clear breach of their fiduciary duties and a gigantic risk to take once the takeover is complete and the Administrators morph into Insolvency Practitioners and start lifiting the drains??

 

I agree but wouldn't put anything past the old regime. Remember a breach of fiduciary duties would have to be proved. Could the administrators uncover any proof if payments had been made privately? I don't know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's purely a suspicion and i have no proof, and i'm probebly readin too much into this but i suspect that kieth has bought the club an paid off mold with skittles and gummy bears!

 

the way i see it, mold's gone, its a new season, lets give the team and kieth a chance. i got my season ticket a while ago and i'm lookin forward to the start of the new season

 

up the vale

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree but wouldn't put anything past the old regime. Remember a breach of fiduciary duties would have to be proved. Could the administrators uncover any proof if payments had been made privately? I don't know.

 

With HMRC sharpening their sabres, why would KR have needed to pay them off to bring about admin? Surely it was inevitable anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest TommyMac
With HMRC sharpening their sabres, why would KR have needed to pay them off to bring about admin? Surely it was inevitable anyway?

 

Quite possibly but would the proposed interim board have sought investment to stave off administration?

 

On a side note, can the administrators not seek to file for neglect of fiduciary duties against MOLD for rejecting investment from Chaudry and subsequently leading the club into admin?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Reporting Posts and other information

    Rules - This forum is moderated but the admin team don't read everything. Don't assume we'll spot rule breaking and alert us by reporting content. Logged in users can hover over the post and click the orange button. Guests can contact us here. If you don't get on with another user you can "ignore" them. Click this link, type in their username and click save. Please check with the admin team if you wish to sell/auction any items. We're happy to support good causes but check first.

    Use - This forum may not be suitable for all as it may contain words or phrases not considered appropriate for some. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and could face legal action should it contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. Please do not reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: phone number, address or email address). This forum is not in any way affiliated with Port Vale FC. OVF reserve the right to edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason. If you spot an offensive post please report it to the admin team (instructions are above).

    Adverts - This site occasionally a) has adverts and sponsored features about gambling b) accepts sponsored posts from third parties. If you require help and advice on gambling read these links: Information on protecting young people | Addiction help from gambleaware.co.uk
  • Friends of OVF

×
×
  • Create New...