Radio Debate

[buffwa]

Never going to happen!!

[X-Valiant]

Bill Bratt said they dont trust Mo, and they will not be talking to him as he has withdrawn his offer, End Of.

 

Do you trust Bill Bratt and if so, why?

[VantaaVale]

Bill Bratt said they dont trust Mo, and they will not be talking to him as he has withdrawn his offer, End Of.

 

And you believe that?

 

Why not ask Mo or TheLegalBeagle whether the offer has been withdrawn?

[Timothius]

Bill Bratt said they dont trust Mo, and they will not be talking to him as he has withdrawn his offer, End Of.

 

But Bill Bratt talks s***, end of.

 

Mo hasn't withdrawn his bid and Bratt and Co are well aware of that, he has simply withdrawn his offer to buy the directors shares back at par the rest of the bid still stands and is why there will be an EGM in the coming weeks to vote on this.

 

Tik tok wait and see

[Trampilot]

Having heard Peter Jackson's ratty voice on Radio Joke and Mo's professional presentation to BBC TV I'll leave it for you to guess who will come across the best.

[TheLegalBeagle]

I'm not knocking Mo, I just know the idea will get totally ignored just like everything else aimed at the board.

 

Dear BD,

 

You will no doubt be proven right - but that is the point really. The board are running out of places to hide and excuses as we address all avenues to facilitate the success of the bid.

 

You will read a press release in a day or so that will yet again put the board on the spot re 24.9% rule which BB has preached as sacred for many months now.

 

The Booard either practice what they preach or stand to be judged as hypocrites as we approach the EGM.

 

Even the most stalwart Board supporters will then have to reflect carefully on their support for fear of such support being percieved as blind and shallow.

 

The V2001 ethos either means something, in which case the Board will accept the revised bid, or it is in truth defunct, in which case the shareholders will see that to be the case and vote for a change in the constitution.

 

Kind Regards

[TheLegalBeagle]

Bill Bratt said they dont trust Mo, and they will not be talking to him as he has withdrawn his offer, End Of.

 

Dear RV,

 

A new offer is to be tabled shortly consistent with the V2001 ethos to which BB frequently refers in print and on radio.

 

It will thus be interesting to see how the Board therefore approach the revised bid as if one is to apply the V2001 ethos the Board cannot and should not refuse. We will find out in truth where the Board really stand with the V2001 ethos - will they practice what they preach or is it simply a device to protects their position collectively?

 

Kind Regards

[Howjy04]

Dear RV,

 

A new offer is to be tabled shortly consistent with the V2001 ethos to which BB frequently refers in print and on radio.

 

It will thus be interesting to see how the Board therefore approach the revised bid as if one is to apply the V2001 ethos the Board cannot and should not refuse. We will find out in truth where the Board really stand with the V2001 ethos - will they practice what they preach or is it simply a device to protects their position collectively?

 

Kind Regards

 

I think it's called " calling their bluff".Please don't sell out to these bar stewards LB.===

[JB78]

Dear RV,

 

A new offer is to be tabled shortly consistent with the V2001 ethos to which BB frequently refers in print and on radio.

 

It will thus be interesting to see how the Board therefore approach the revised bid as if one is to apply the V2001 ethos the Board cannot and should not refuse. We will find out in truth where the Board really stand with the V2001 ethos - will they practice what they preach or is it simply a device to protects their position collectively?

 

Kind Regards

 

LB

 

it is clear that the board are not interested in any investment (from anyone) if it adversely affects their position as directors

they only want donations, to use themselves.

 

i assume this new bid is maybe Mo, Mark Simms and maybe a n other each taking a max 24.9% but with a total of 51%?

they will just say the club is not for sale

 

they will dig their heals in til the egm, engage in more dirty tricks and if they think they have lost they will continue to ramp up club costs for you to sort out.

they are not vale fans, they are only fans of themselves

[carpetman123]

Dear RV,

 

A new offer is to be tabled shortly consistent with the V2001 ethos to which BB frequently refers in print and on radio.

 

It will thus be interesting to see how the Board therefore approach the revised bid as if one is to apply the V2001 ethos the Board cannot and should not refuse. We will find out in truth where the Board really stand with the V2001 ethos - will they practice what they preach or is it simply a device to protects their position collectively?

 

Kind Regards

 

I take it from that then that Mo is going to purchase 24.9% to get in there!!! and call Bratts Bluff?

[Burt]

I'm not knocking Mo, I just know the idea will get totally ignored just like everything else aimed at the board.

 

But it will make the board look even worse, so can do no harm in his plight.

 

Anyone on the board's side won't have a leg to stand on. 'Don't back Mo, back V2001.' 'So why didn't they agree to the radio thing if they've got nothing to hide?'

 

Edit - just seen LB's post saying the same, just better.

[Timothius]

LB

 

it is clear that the board are not interested in any investment (from anyone) if it adversely affects their position as directors

they only want donations, to use themselves.

 

i assume this new bid is maybe Mo, Mark Simms and maybe a n other each taking a max 24.9% but with a total of 51%?

they will just say the club is not for sale

 

they will dig their heals in til the egm, engage in more dirty tricks and if they think they have lost they will continue to ramp up club costs for you to sort out.

they are not vale fans, they are only fans of themselves

 

But didn't Mr Bratt invite Mo Chaudrey to invest 24.9% last Saturday via the Sentinel? Surely he can't turn him down if he wants to do this especially when he has publically invited him to do so?

 

Re mark Simms, isn't this the same perosn they have been happy to take large sponsorship from in the past and were actively pursuing a few weeks ago to get him to invest? Surely such a genuine Vale supporter could not be refused if he to wants to buy 24.9% of the shares?

[melv]

If Mo is the wrong person for Port Vale then this is the boards opportunity to prove why to all fans and hopefully put this whole thing to bed once and for all, one way or the other. The trouble is, I don't think the board have the bottle to participate.

 

Over to you Mr Bratt (again!).

 

Will there be anyone operating the Bill's lie counter?

[The Wonder of You]

But didn't Mr Bratt invite Mo Chaudrey to invest 24.9% last Saturday via the Sentinel? Surely he can't turn him down if he wants to do this especially when he has publically invited him to do so?

 

Re mark Simms, isn't this the same perosn they have been happy to take large sponsorship from in the past and were actively pursuing a few weeks ago to get him to invest? Surely such a genuine Vale supporter could not be refused if he to wants to buy 24.9% of the shares?

 

Now that sounds like a plan! Between them 49.8% would be quite a powerful position. Be interesting reading on how they reject this if put forward.

[melv]

Now that sounds like a plan! Between them 49.8% would be quite a powerful position. Be interesting reading on how they reject this if put forward.

 

Paper work will get lost,go missing.