Confusion

[geosname]

Im more confused than ever....

 

Miller was offered a rolling contract reviewable in 3 years before he was voted onto the board but once on voted himself down to a 3 month contract which has now expired.

 

It takes 4 directors to sign players but only one to sign a 300K loan.

 

Adams was sorting out players for the January window only to find it had been double glazed by the board who dont have any money for him.

 

Oliver was leaving in December but the board postponed it until February by changing the AGM date.

 

Deakin resigns and is serving out his notice which keeps him in office until the end of February but he is staying until the end of the season.

 

Deakin initially purchased his shares with a promissory note but paid cash [his own] in December but then states he hasnt and he doesnt own any shares and never has.

 

Miller the blimp drifts back to the USA to his repossessed house, possibly never to return [we hope], but still has shares he hasnt paid for and his employment agreement shredded because he failed to deliver the BS deal but still remains a director.

 

Oliver still thinks miller is doing a great job even after he was sacked as chairman and his salary stopped for failing to deliver.

 

Lloyd who is vice chair and has been working closely with miller on the BS deal and contributed to the board decisions claims he doesnt know what is going on... with anything.

 

They all claimed the BS deal was good and progressing well after it was dead in the water then claim to have sacked miller because the BS deal failed before they claimed it was still good.

 

Im getting to old for this cack:(

[doggone]

Im more confused than ever....

 

Miller was offered a rolling contract reviewable in 3 years before he was voted onto the board but once on voted himself down to a 3 month contract which has now expired.

 

It takes 4 directors to sign players but only one to sign a 300K loan.

 

Adams was sorting out players for the January window only to find it had been double glazed by the board who dont have any money for him.

 

Oliver was leaving in December but the board postponed it until February by changing the AGM date.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deakin resigns and is serving out his notice which keeps him in office until the end of February but he is staying until the end of the season.

 

Deakin initially purchased his shares with a promissory note but paid cash [his own] in December but then states he hasnt and he doesnt own any shares and never has.

 

Miller the blimp drifts back to the USA to his repossessed house, possibly never to return [we hope], but still has shares he hasnt paid for and his employment agreement shredded because he failed to deliver the BS deal but still remains a director.

 

Oliver still thinks miller is doing a great job even after he was sacked as chairman and his salary stopped for failing to deliver.

 

Lloyd who is vice chair and has been working closely with miller on the BS deal and contributed to the board decisions claims he doesnt know what is going on... with anything.

 

They all claimed the BS deal was good and progressing well after it was dead in the water then claim to have sacked miller because the BS deal failed before they claimed it was still good.

 

Im getting to old for this cack:(

 

Could become a script for a new series of Soap

 

"Confused? you will be!"

[KEV.WILLIE]

Im more confused than ever....

 

Miller was offered a rolling contract reviewable in 3 years before he was voted onto the board but once on voted himself down to a 3 month contract which has now expired.

 

It takes 4 directors to sign players but only one to sign a 300K loan.

 

Adams was sorting out players for the January window only to find it had been double glazed by the board who dont have any money for him.

 

Oliver was leaving in December but the board postponed it until February by changing the AGM date.

 

Deakin resigns and is serving out his notice which keeps him in office until the end of February but he is staying until the end of the season.

 

Deakin initially purchased his shares with a promissory note but paid cash [his own] in December but then states he hasnt and he doesnt own any shares and never has.

 

Miller the blimp drifts back to the USA to his repossessed house, possibly never to return [we hope], but still has shares he hasnt paid for and his employment agreement shredded because he failed to deliver the BS deal but still remains a director.

 

Oliver still thinks miller is doing a great job even after he was sacked as chairman and his salary stopped for failing to deliver.

 

Lloyd who is vice chair and has been working closely with miller on the BS deal and contributed to the board decisions claims he doesnt know what is going on... with anything.

 

They all claimed the BS deal was good and progressing well after it was dead in the water then claim to have sacked miller because the BS deal failed before they claimed it was still good.

 

Im getting to old for this cack:(

 

The problem is they have told that many lies they dont know themselves.

 

I firmley believe PD id only back because he knows to much!

 

There is deffinitley some illegal skeletons in the cupboard IMO

[MattW]

Very good post, it's unconprehendable how we've been run over the last 6 months let alone the last 10 years.

 

SHAMBLES!!!!!!!

[Edge81]

The problem is they have told that many lies they dont know themselves.

 

I firmley believe PD id only back because he knows to much!

 

There is deffinitley some illegal skeletons in the cupboard IMO

 

PD and PM both have shares in their names, ML and GO will use these for their own agenda at the EGM. That is why PD is still here.

[KEV.WILLIE]

PD and PM both have shares in their names, ML and GO will use these for their own agenda at the EGM. That is why PD is still here.

 

Good point!!

[doggone]

The problem is they have told that many lies they dont know themselves.

 

I firmley believe PD id only back because he knows to much!

 

There is deffinitley some illegal skeletons in the cupboard IMO

 

If this is true then I support Admin. lets find out what has gone on in the past and let the Administrator decide if Deakin & Miller are shareholders and so between them need to cough up £350k

[doggone]

Deakin initially purchased his shares with a promissory note but paid cash [his own] in December but then states he hasnt and he doesnt own any shares and never has.

 

(

 

If he doesn't own any shares and never has he can't be a Director.

I bet he resigned his Directorship as soon as he was informed that he had to sign a personal guarantee.

[melv]

Im more confused than ever....

 

Miller was offered a rolling contract reviewable in 3 years before he was voted onto the board but once on voted himself down to a 3 month contract which has now expired.

 

It takes 4 directors to sign players but only one to sign a 300K loan.

 

Adams was sorting out players for the January window only to find it had been double glazed by the board who dont have any money for him.

 

Oliver was leaving in December but the board postponed it until February by changing the AGM date.

 

Deakin resigns and is serving out his notice which keeps him in office until the end of February but he is staying until the end of the season.

 

Deakin initially purchased his shares with a promissory note but paid cash [his own] in December but then states he hasnt and he doesnt own any shares and never has.

 

Miller the blimp drifts back to the USA to his repossessed house, possibly never to return [we hope], but still has shares he hasnt paid for and his employment agreement shredded because he failed to deliver the BS deal but still remains a director.

 

Oliver still thinks miller is doing a great job even after he was sacked as chairman and his salary stopped for failing to deliver.

 

Lloyd who is vice chair and has been working closely with miller on the BS deal and contributed to the board decisions claims he doesnt know what is going on... with anything.

 

They all claimed the BS deal was good and progressing well after it was dead in the water then claim to have sacked miller because the BS deal failed before they claimed it was still good.

 

Im getting to old for this cack:(

 

That is a good sum up of just how confusing it is.This needs to be printed of as a quick reminder to people,it Printing in the Sentinel etc.

[KEV.WILLIE]

If this is true then I support Admin. lets find out what has gone on in the past and let the Administrator decide if Deakin & Miller are shareholders and so between them need to cough up £350k

 

Its only my opinion, but the question is ' why are they so keen to keep hold of power'

 

Deakin has also stated that he was only doing as he was directed to do at the club(by others), if that is the case then why has he returned(and been allowed to return) knowing what he did at best imoral???,

at worst illegal

 

I think the others are sh@tting themselves incase he spills the beans

[Fosse69]

According to todays Sentinel, Deakin is staying on to pick his successor. It seems to me they are deliberately trying to wind fans up into doing something stupid. Difficult days, but the legal ways will do the job.

[geosname]

If administration happens what happens to the promissory notes for shares?

Are deakin and miller liable?

If deakin and miller cant be chased are other board members liable for allowing them?

Can/will the administrator chase them for payment [court action]?

 

If the answer to any of the above is yes it may to some extent explain why sphincters are twitching.

[geosname]

Now we add to the confusion...

Deakin apparently resigned in November, before he paid cash for the shares he purchased with a credit note. He then paid with cash after he had resigned. His 3 month notice period was due to expire at the end of February but he is so indispensable the board, of whom he is one, have asked him to stay on until the end of the season. However as lloyd knows nothing about anything, the Hindenburg replica is in the USA considering his future now he is not employed by Vale it begs the question.........

Which quorate 4 directors decided to offer deakin an extension?... the same 4 that accepted his resignation in November? The same 4 that sacked the blimp? The same 4 that hired the blimp?

If deakin cant vote for himself [conflict of interest] which numpty stood in for him? Or was it the inquorate 3 but a different inquorate 3 that sacked miller? Or the inquorate 1 that agreed the loan?