FAO Micky adams

[Burt]

I'm sure Micky will still feel he joined the board for the right reasons, and won't have any regrets in doing so. Aside from that, he'll be well aware of financial shortcomings (at least by January if he doesn't now), but he can't come out and say he agrees with the protestors, as that's simply stating he wants his employers to leave!!

[Burt]

That's a bit like me saying "I used to be an axe murderer but I'm ok now"

 

He was privy to the goings on in the boardroom. If he chose to ignore it then he is guilty of negligence. I think this is what a lot of people failed to see when he took the step. You can't just be a director to make up the numbers. It carries a responsibility to the shareholders.

 

If criminal actions are taken against the board he may just find this out the hard way.

 

Micky Adams isn't half as clever as he thinks.

 

I'm sure he said all along he would only do it to make up the numbers, and not have to be involved with the 'political' issues. Naive maybe, but nothing more.

[Robbie Earle's Perm]

He was privy to the goings on in the boardroom.

 

Was he though? We have seen key correspondence keeping Milker, Deakin, Oliver and Lloyd in the loop but conveniently not including Adams or Meigh.

[zaza123]

I'm sure Micky will still feel he joined the board for the right reasons, and won't have any regrets in doing so.

 

I'm sure you are right Burt. He obviously isn't burdened by much of a conscience and didn't seem to wrestle too much with his pride when uncle Bill begged him to come back on an improved deal after he had failed miserably at Sheffield Utd.

[pete vale]

To be honest I think Micky doesn't give 2 f***s about what the fans say, prove us wrong Micky. Remember this time last year?

[Howjy04]

I'm sure he said all along he would only do it to make up the numbers, and not have to be involved with the 'political' issues. Naive maybe, but nothing more.

 

We'll see how naive he is if plod turn up.

[Robbie Earle's Perm]

I'm sure he said all along he would only do it to make up the numbers, and not have to be involved with the 'political' issues. Naive maybe, but nothing more.

 

Naive and probably a bit stupid given what's gone on but now is not the time to get on the back of Micky, its time we shifted these four clearly culpable ****bags from the boardroom.

 

If it then transpires through proof he or Meigh were in on things then action can be taken.

 

This is just another diatraction.

[rayzer]

Micky would not speak out while he still has a very good contract that still has two and a half years still to run. Let's face it if Micky walked away he would probably find it very difficult to get another job in football management.

[zaza123]

Was he though? We have seen key correspondence keeping Milker' date=' Deakin, Oliver and Lloyd in the loop but conveniently not including Adams or Meigh.[/quote']

 

As an aside, I do like the typo for Miller. Quite appropriate. :D

[Volcano]

He lied about promising to buy shares in order to convince less suspicious shareholders to vote him on to the board.

 

Familiar?

 

No, Micky made it clear beforehand that it was Stan Meigh's proxy, after Mark Sims released a statement regarding his confusion. I remember.

[Robbie Earle's Perm]

As an aside, I do like the typo for Miller. Quite appropriate. :D

 

Oh yeah, I shall claim that as intentional (and not because k comes before l on my keypad!!) :D

[valefan16]

Micky's fair enough saying that he cant really speak out against his employers and from a footballing point of view it is possibly a hindrance as he wants the fans in the ground supporting the team rather than the potential distraction.

 

Saying what he is saying isnt necersarilly saying he is backing Miller and Deakin.

[Bald Eagle]

That's a bit like me saying "I used to be an axe murderer but I'm ok now"

 

He was privy to the goings on in the boardroom. If he chose to ignore it then he is guilty of negligence. I think this is what a lot of people failed to see when he took the step. You can't just be a director to make up the numbers. It carries a responsibility to the shareholders.

 

If criminal actions are taken against the board he may just find this out the hard way.

 

Micky Adams isn't half as clever as he thinks.

 

 

:clap:

[zaza123]

No, Micky made it clear beforehand that it was Stan Meigh's proxy, after Mark Sims released a statement regarding his confusion. I remember.

 

http://www.thisisstaffordshire.co.uk/Port-Vale-Supporters-hit-Adams-board-announcement/story-12718123-detail/story.html

[zaza123]

Naive and probably a bit stupid given what's gone on but now is not the time to get on the back of Micky, its time we shifted these four clearly culpable ****bags from the boardroom.

 

If it then transpires through proof he or Meigh were in on things then action can be taken.

 

This is just another diatraction.

 

You are probably right. It does slightly nark me though when his part in this is glossed over too easily.