Agenda for Sundays Open Meeting at BGWMC

[brookersleftboot]

I think they're all watching the stoke game!!

 

Laughing at their penalty miss i hope!!!!

[Burslem Academicals]

F.A.O. softbursleyvolauvent.

 

To consider that those who want change are a small minority and therefore that the majority support the Board is frankly ridiculous.....results from the NLV poll,SC poll and EGM clearly demonstrate that over 80% want change...even the vast majority inside the ground want change not to mention the 11,000 years of lost support.

Has there been any evidence or poll that has not shown 80% against the Board and a majority backing the Board.The NLV/SC/EGM have all made it

clear that the majority want change.

The state of the club for many is not hilarious it is tragic.

[Andyregs]

What are you on about? Ignore list for you mate.

 

Vale have about 6,000 fans and the majority have never voted on anything.

 

Who do you think you are ?

 

Like I said, you aren't able to grasp the most simple of things. If having a 100% turnout in a vote is the only way to make it statistically relevant (its not by the way), then pretty much any vote ever is not relevant, even when we vote for government. However, with a big enough sample, you can make judgements on what the general consensus of a population is. The size of the NLV and EGM votes were big enough to make a statistically relevant judgement.

[Trentham Lakes Valiant]

If that's you in the photo - did you enjoy the game yesterday?

 

...and I thought you were a big SEOer. Haha!

 

I am in the photo and did not attend the game.

[Guest southburslemvaliant]

F.A.O BurslemChemicals

 

"..results from the NLV poll,SC poll and EGM clearly demonstrate that over 80% want change"

 

Not all Vale fans were polled.

 

"even the vast majority inside the ground want change"

 

How do you know? Have you been to a game this season?

"Has there been any evidence or poll that has not shown 80% against the Board and a majority backing the Board."

 

Have I argued that the majority back the board or have you presumed I think that?

 

 

Nothing is clear. We are unbeaten in the league and looking good. What's tragic about that?

 

Isn't time you told us we are going into administration soon?

[Trentham Lakes Valiant]

You are bang out of order!

 

How so?..............

[Aussie Rules]

Any snippets yet from BGWMC?

[Guest southburslemvaliant]

Like I said, you aren't able to grasp the most simple of things. If having a 100% turnout in a vote is the only way to make it statistically relevant (its not by the way), then pretty much any vote ever is not relevant, even when we vote for government. However, with a big enough sample, you can make judgements on what the general consensus of a population is. The size of the NLV and EGM votes were big enough to make a statistically relevant judgement.

 

When we vote for government it is not relevant because everyone didn't vote.

 

You heard it here first.

 

Stop trying to justify it you can't spin it.

[Valiant Exile]

Aussie there are a number of tweets being made by @therealmickeybr or just search Twitter using #pvfc. Not too much though ===

[Aussie Rules]

Aussie there are a number of tweets being made by @therealmickeybr or just search Twitter using #pvfc. Not too much though ===

 

Thanks VE :D

[Guest southburslemvaliant]

I am in the photo and did not attend the game.

 

Apologies, I assumed you were the guy with his head up.

[Andyregs]

When we vote for government it is not relevant because everyone didn't vote.

 

You heard it here first.

 

Stop trying to justify it you can't spin it.

 

Is that a statement? Or have you failed to grasp what I said in any shape or form? Either way its laughable! No spin, just sound sound of everything flying straight over your head! :rolleyes:

[Guest southburslemvaliant]

Is that a statement? Or have you failed to grasp what I said in any shape or form? Either way its laughable! No spin, just sound sound of everything flying straight over your head! :rolleyes:

 

Stop trying to look intelligent it doesn't work.

 

I'm not interested in other polls or the national elections.

 

A guy has made a wild estimate and you're trying to back him up with ideas taken from surveys about toothpaste.

 

For arguments sake, how about we use the ratio of number of people marching to the number of people attending the match?

[Birdy]

Before you talk about the "common element of feeling" amongst Vale fans can I ask how many home games have you attended this year? How many away games? How many times you've had a drink in Burslem this season? How many times you've spoke to a Vale fan at the corner shop? How many Vale fans have you discussed this with at work?

 

Try not to lecture me from London. I'm here, in Burslem.

 

I have no simplistic argument.

 

Somebody is making wild statements that need correcting (as usual with BurslemChemicals).

 

Simple question for you, why didn't the majority show this "common element of feeling" at the March?

 

I'm not lecturing you little boy I am posting a viewpoint, something you can't grasp. You are where you are in cyber space under an alias, I am real in London (originally from Castle) as a Vale fan (30 years) who has contributed under NLV a damn sight more positive contributions via numerous measures than you.

 

I have not been to Burslem this season and nor shall I under the current regime structure, I have been away and I have witnessed an overwhelming response to change, maybe not to SEO or marching but change. I also know pro changers who have been to Burslem and VP and their attitude is still pro change.

 

The March was badly advertised as SEO, which of course it wasn't and was a mistake IMO. Anyway twelve months on, we are winning the battle with many directors gone, more on the way and MS and others still in the picture.

 

I reiterate where are the surveys on the pro board, you fail every time to answer that, attending VP doesn't make you a board lover.

 

You have a simplistic argument and seem to be very simplistic in mind. Some may call you a ******, not me though.

[Andyregs]

(1) Stop trying to look intelligent it doesn't work.

 

(2) I'm not interested in other polls or the national elections.

 

(3) A guy has made a wild estimate and you're trying to back him up with ideas taken from surveys about toothpaste.

 

(4) For arguments sake, how about we use the ratio of number of people marching to the number of people attending the match?

 

(1) I will if you stop trying to look daft.

(2) Then dont make wildly inaccurate posts about what makes a survey relevant.

(3) Someone made an estimate based on solid facts and the statistical relevance of surveys. You have based yours on ignorance.

(4) Which proves nothing (unless...and I'm repeating myself...you believe the majority wanted gannon to stay...wanted glover to stay...and never wanted V2001 in the first place...you cant have it both ways).