Andyregs

The irony of people who access their news from project veritas and Fox News ‘exposing’ CNN for bias lol.

Yes. Hence this line in the article: “And peers warned it would take much longer for vital data to be passed to frontline police officers.”

You’ve lost touch with any semblance of what truth is, what constitutes evidence and what a legitimate source is. Sources are left wing rags when you don’t agree, but the truth when it does. ‘The last source you gave was from pragerU. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/prageru/ “Overall, we rate PragerU Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of propaganda, the use of poor sources who have failed fact checks” BBC, channel 4, ITV, the so called biased main stream media are rated ‘High’. But I suppose that’s biased too in your world. But to support the lies told by trump and then claim such media reporting give no semblance of democracy is pretty impressive mental gymnastics, but you’ve become adept at that over the last 2 years. “Getting close to the original source” , says the guy who’s sources are often Fox News talking heads with their ‘entertainment’ shows. https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye?t=1618436136505 For example, I wouldn’t use Huffington post as a source here as I know it wouldn’t be respected as neutral source, but you and others here have gone over the edge and consider any source that isnt a crackpot conspiracy theorist or random YouTuber that says what you want as fake news. We scoff at a YouTuber whose first line is a blatant lie. You scoff as court documents, journals, respected media outlets, academic studies and anything that doesn’t fit your reality.

https://uc3fb04e181cd203739888554e62.dl.dropboxusercontent.com/cd/0/inline2/BMl88uUZR6VwZE0sT904Gx4VtAvRkxqTSHPFq7462lVfkIhe2YjZDO4dAh1AZMo2-7VyivpCMMlj5G380SM17ig2Emvig3EqmvWj1a-YOUlq87u68p-rxa6zeSXgwknLoVAXfP5Xr_iUpBDVch07MXAdQCFbsddQ_0xfs5bqyhFtPJAey3GVNdLGSEA0JwjSmZGctPXw1ZGc-HCJC2915VeYXl5XCJW_q3qcsDi2oo4U1lg4ED7zPdlfv42AaLX-3SyqeGpCHJFVYuxlw2LC8wlnQvFc8d93ScUdFeJ_8-prjh2C6TV4dTCEmGJRgECUi3S5knYEhRkPxaH39I7iiXweqE_jTn9PZ5Yw3VmfStBxrzJVTgZC4mgva4Gp2mlyquw/file# “Results suggest a minimal role for all factors except Republican control of state government, which dramatically reduces states’ democratic performance during this period,” https://www.vox.com/2021/4/5/22358325/study-republican-control-state-government-bad-for-democracy

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2021/04/13/in-america-republican-led-states-are-rolling-back-electoral-and-civil-liberties

I said show me. And show me how it was an ‘armed uprising against the United States’ seems like a Mitch McConnell, republican senate leader, agrees with me. "They failed to attempt to obstruct the Congress. This failed insurrection underscored how crucial the task before us is for our public." Edit: And for the record, I’d criticise anyone who commits violence politically or not (and the evidence shows right wing violence is far more an issue than left, and I can source that if you like). But what you suggest wasn’t an uprising against the United States government’ Be good to see where Biden defended any terrorists while at it. Never mind say he ‘loved them’.

I’m sure you find such accusations ‘outrageous’ usually. What makes him a bigot?

Fine. Show me when antifa attempted insurrection. And downplaying what happened at the capitol as a scuffle just shows the laughable lengths you’ll go to for ‘your side’. And the reason those words have never been used elsewhere is pretty clear. I mean, thanks for pointing out why you’re wrong. Obviously the reality you live in is different.

Weren’t you defending the use of a random youtuber as a source the other day? and I did engage the content. Ive challenged you to defend the journalistic merits of what he said and the facts he has unearthed. You mentioned gaslighting?

I’m trying to get to what you mean by democrats not wanting to investigate voter fraud. Do you mean legitimate voter fraud or any lies people make up with no evidence? Lol of all people

Have the democrats told the police to no follow up cases with evidence?

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/688343

Making things up. Any time there is evidence of voter fraud, the police have followed it up.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21565503.2020.1773280?journalCode=rpgi20&

25% of black Americans lack photo ID. 8% of white people. There are studies that show it will disenfranchise minorities. There are quotes from republicans that show they believe suppressing the vote will benefit them. You don’t pander to conspiracy theorists. They ‘believe’ what they need to in order to fit their made up reality that trump is the rightful president. Conspiracy theorists and seditionists shouldn’t dictate policy. Suppressing the votes of others to pander to them would be ridiculous.