Andyregs

And?

Why?

Could be worse though. At least we don’t have someone leading us through a pandemic who looks like he’s taking part in a comedy sketch from The Office. https://twitter.com/meenaharris/status/1290529678252531712?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1290529678252531712|twgr^&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.huffpost.com%2Fentry%2Ftrump-axios-interview_n_5f290ee6c5b656e9b09fc1ec

Literally on this thread Like I said, there’s a choice between the minor inconvenience of wearing a face mask and possibly saving lives, and being selfish and not. Is it really that much of an issue, to the point of protesting? http://files.fast.ai/papers/masks_lit_review.pdf Or instead of wimps and being thick, some are just willing to put up with minor inconvenience if there’s a possibility it may save lives, and are secure enough not to feel wimpy about it. It blows my mind how people can become so angry and politicised over wearing a protective face mask.

So your point about bill gates now was a positive? It didn’t come across that way originally? Just as You went from saying we were being ‘played as fools’ to ‘the government panicked’. From something sinister to a mistake? as for Berlin, no idea what websites your looking at to see 1 million protestors quoted, I’ve only seen 20,000. I’ve also no idea why you would want 1 million people protesting about having to wear a face mask that could potentially save lives. The worst outcome is you are slightly uncomfortable, the best is that many lives are saved.

All that isn’t based on any theory at all. You’re asking me which made up scenario is best, where the made up scenario you approve of has better made up numbers? My opinion is to follow the guidance of the majority of worlds scientific experts. I have no idea what some people believe they are conspiring together to achieve.

Lockdown breaches don’t compare to the amount of social distancing that the whole country staying at home for two months achieved. There have been 45000 death and 300,000 confirmed cases. Herd immunity would require tens of millions of people to catch it? Of course more may have had it but how many lives would you be prepared to sacrifice on such an unknown?

The scientist behind Sweden’s lockdown has said that knowing what they know now, they would have put more lockdown processes in place. Still unsure what your point about bill gates and vaccines is though.

For me thats the really important factor.

Youve just repeated yourself instead of answering. I asked why you think he is 'pushing' a vaccine? You seem to be skirting around some sort of conspiracy theory here without committing to it. And im sorry but your last point just puts all the others into context.

Why do you think bill gates is 'pushing' a vaccine? And why is it not necessary?

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/swiss-policy-research/ "In general, this is a conspiracy website that is not credible due to poor sourcing and lack of transparency." Any proper sources that sweden has herd immunity? The 'many people believe' is a bit too trumponian for me. https://www.businessinsider.com/sweden-covid-19-policy-experts-too-early-judge-2020-7?r=US&IR=T

But Sweden hasn’t been successful and was the worst hit out of Scandinavian counties. https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2376 youre not a conspiracy theorist but your sources are conspiracy theory websites https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/swiss-policy-research/

The problem with the lockdown saving thousands of lives is that it convinces people that it wasn’t needed. As though the only evidence that would prove its needed is more people dying, which would then also prove the lockdown didn’t work. The same thing happened with the y2k bug. People now think it was a bit of a joke and hysteria, but that’s because of all the work that went into it not being an issue. One reason hospital deaths are going down is because we are getting better at treating it and understand what drugs can help with the disease. The alternative is that the government closed down the country knowing that it was pointless and purposely damaging the economy. as much as i dislike the tories, I’ll go with the most obvious reasoning, backed up by the doctors and scientists, unless given some actual evidence otherwise.

I’m not debating how s**t the art is. I’m asking why you’re still blaming the left for things you don’t like despite the tories being I. Charge of the nations purse strings for a decade.