Humour Bypasses and The Perpetually Offended

[carl]

Pretty much answered for me, really must learn how to use the multi quote posting system! :)

 

I haven't done analysis of my posts, I leave that to the completely obsessed, but like others I imagine I'm on here at down periods / travel times in my day. Simple really.

 

You are on this site 24/7 that's why you have nearly 17,000 posts in 5 years. Don't need to analyse or be a Rocket scientist to work that one out:rolleyes:

 

So to say you are only on at certain times is a contradictive betrayal of the facts really

[Robbie Earle's Perm]

You are on this site 24/7 that's why you have nearly 17,000 posts in 5 years. Don't need to analyse or be a Rocket scientist to work that one out:rolleyes:

 

So to say you are only on at certain times is a contradictive betrayal of the facts really

 

I'm always logged in as I use mobile only most of the time and always have the page open in my browser.

 

It's good to see you back posting hundreds of times a day anyway after you went into hiding! ;)

[JOHNNYAITCH]

Do I detect some anger from sid the mouth

 

Nope..you mean about as much to me as a pebble on the beach at Sidmouth so nothing to get angry about...wrong again

 

- now perhaps you can see what is like to be discussed in a post to someone else, like you and REP did. Doubt if you'll learn from it, but if it got up your nose, job done.

 

Job not done..but if that's your motive in posting...failed badly

 

It's a forum..people are free to discuss posts and posters

 

For you of all creatures to call someone else arrogant is indeed priceless.

 

Give me an example of my arrogance?

 

In answer to the Vale ratio, Id say anyone who posted less than about 25 per cent about Vale should be posting on another site, try the Monty Python 'is this a 5-minute argument' sit - that should suit you.

 

So we now have to post according to the rules od D@P? And I'm supposed to be arrogant?

 

And if you don't like me mentioning Vale in the last part of a long post, then either put me on ignore or complain to admin - oood luck with that,

 

I don 't put anyone on ignore..goes against my principles. More arrogance..now you claim to know how the admin would react to your post being reported to them

[JOHNNYAITCH]

Thanks for that valuable contribution, but I fear you missed the point - that REP accuses me of being obsessed or infatuated or similar dross but it was he who came wading in with a personal attack unrelated to the thread it was posted on, and I was under the impression that posts have the time on, sequential or not. The loonbucket REP posts were all at between 5.17 and about 5.30 this morning - perhaps he is back in Papua New Guinea ?

 

So not content with trying to dictate how many times people should post in sequence and the ratio of vale posts to non-vale posts you now question when people are on here? What has it got to do with you when people post?

 

You count my posts and split them into vale and non-vale and yet accuse others of being obsessed? I'd call counting someone's posts and classifying them to make a purile point obsessive...in my opinion of course

 

As usual without nonsense like this you have got nothing

 

 

I take it these remarks are ok with you on an ' open forum' - despite the act you re ready to take the side of a proven liar (over is imaginary 46 Vale videos) and continual ganging up with J Aitch - are you joining them now?

 

Are you seriously suggesting that if people agree on something and say so that they are ganging up? Again you make stuff up cos without it you have nothing.

[JOHNNYAITCH]

You are on this site 24/7 that's why you have nearly 17,000 posts in 5 years. Don't need to analyse or be a Rocket scientist to work that one out:rolleyes:

 

So to say you are only on at certain times is a contradictive betrayal of the facts really

 

So based on the number of posts you are able to determine how much time someone spends actually looking at or posting on this site? Impressive.

 

I'd bet you that you can't but.,.well..you know...track record and all that..I'm sure you understand

[JOHNNYAITCH]

Your point being?

Were you not complaining about posts in a row?

 

I thought it was pretty maids in a row?

[JOHNNYAITCH]

Pretty much answered for me, really must learn how to use the multi quote posting system! :)

 

I haven't done analysis of my posts, I leave that to the completely obsessed, but like others I imagine I'm on here at down periods / travel times in my day. Simple really.

 

Come on admit it..you have some sort of alert setup so that when I post you get a nice tune played on your mobile so that you can agree with me on here and gang up on people and when some others post it makes a f@rting noise telling you to consult with me before posting so that we can agree which one of us is the ar$e end of the horse this time round

[JOHNNYAITCH]

Six posts in a row..do I get a prize or a ticking off?

[davidatpreston]

Nicely put FUA. There you go DAP

 

Yes, but maybe it applied to you.

On second thoughts, it would take your 46 videos to cover your mouth not just a hand.

[Memphis]

Saw a post in Twitter earlier:

 

"Back to the Future 2 to be remade, but instead of flying cars they'll have people glued to their phones and being offended by everything."

 

Seems about right.

[Robbie Earle's Perm]

Six posts in a row..do I get a prize or a ticking off?

 

Dave will be on shortly to do an analysis for you, not that he's obsessed or owt! ;)

[Robbie Earle's Perm]

Saw a post in Twitter earlier:

 

"Back to the Future 2 to be remade, but instead of flying cars they'll have people glued to their phones and being offended by everything."

 

Seems about right.

 

Absolutely spot on!

[Robbie Earle's Perm]

Yes, but maybe it applied to you.

On second thoughts, it would take your 46 videos to cover your mouth not just a hand.

 

Do you want me to arrange some for you, are you feeling left out?

[JOHNNYAITCH]

Did anyone watch the Harry Enfield/Paul Whitehouse programme on BBC2 last night? They certainly pushed the boundaries but regarding some of it I haven't laughed so much in a long while.

 

Didn't find the sketches featuring people with mental health issues/dementia funny but them's the breaks when you're sailing close to the wind as they often do/did

[Robbie Earle's Perm]

Did anyone watch the Harry Enfield/Paul Whitehouse programme on BBC2 last night? They certainly pushed the boundaries but regarding some of it I haven't laughed so much in a long while.

 

Didn't find the sketches featuring people with mental health issues/dementia funny but them's the breaks when you're sailing close to the wind as they often do/did

 

Is it showing on the iplayer?