Mo Chaudry Response

[Stafford Valiant]

http://www.mochaudry.co.uk/?p=734

 

A poor response in my opinion and one that I feel is as unprofessional as the boards initial letter.

 

I hope that this is only part of a pack of information that has been sent out to the shareholder pre-EGM and hope to god that this hasn't just gone into an envelope on it's own.

[vale9t9]

Worth looking at just for the photo-shoot at the top of the page! Haha, Olan Mills eat your heart out!!!

[tisdeano]

Worth looking at just for the photo-shoot at the top of the page! Haha, Olan Mills eat your heart out!!!

 

im sure mo will be pleased you like it

[vale9t9]

What is there to dislike about it. Guaranteed to bring a smile to anyones boatrace!

[tisdeano]

What is there to dislike about it. Guaranteed to bring a smile to anyones boatrace!

 

Excellent, its a very good trait, the ability to make people smile, perhaps the custodians could try it every now and again

[Birdy]

Isn't it a sad indictment of the board that they cannot discuss, debate or challenge the merits of the bid instead of swipes on a personal level.

 

I have read all of the boards personal attacks, (I have to call them that as there is no substantial or factual content surrounding the bid) and it makes them look even more vulnerable, scared and pathetic and can my opinion of them collectively get any lower, for sure?

 

There is a portion of people out there who do not see these sites and maybe naïve enough to believe the propaganda the board push. I think it is only fair that Mo's team put the shareholders straight on what the board posted out.

 

There is a reason the board or their media puppets refuse to openly debate the bid, either via radio or a fans forum, it's because their argument (or lack of) is fragile and more cracks than a Macc Lads song.

[valiant]

I hope that this is only part of a pack of information that has been sent out to the shareholder pre-EGM and hope to god that this hasn't just gone into an envelope on it's own.

I don't think this is anything to do with being sent to shareholders its just a copy of the One Vale Fan news article from a week ago...

 

http://www.onevalefan.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=54392

 

EDIT: oh yes it is being sent to shareholders my mistake.

[tisdeano]

I don't think this is anything to do with being sent to shareholders its just a copy of the One Vale Fan news article from a week ago...

 

http://www.onevalefan.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=54392

 

The below response to the smear campaign will be mailed to all shareholders of Port Vale FC. The document addresses each attempted smear, swiftly and succinctly. Mo Chaudry continues to focus on the task at hand, namely helping create a future at Port Vale FC we can all be proud of.

 

[Jinkin John Jeffers]

Simple straight forward response from a man personally attacked by this pathetic board.

 

Something he should not need to do, if the board had acted in the best interest of the club and not themselves in the first place.

[fairportnick]

it's because their argument (or lack of) is fragile and more cracks than a Macc Lads song.

 

And the Macc Lads hate Vale too.:D

[lydiatevaliant]

http://www.mochaudry.co.uk/?p=734

 

A poor response in my opinion and one that I feel is as unprofessional as the boards initial letter.

 

I hope that this is only part of a pack of information that has been sent out to the shareholder pre-EGM and hope to god that this hasn't just gone into an envelope on it's own.

 

I don't think that's the full response, just the first page.

[Aussie Rules]

I don't think that's the full response, just the first page.

 

You're right 'Lydiate

 

Here is the full respone:

 

http://www.onevalefan.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=54392

[Fosse69]

Yet again keeps his comments out of the gutter, unlike Bratt/Board

[mattclorenz]

And the Macc Lads hate Vale too.:D

 

Can't beat the Macc Lads. Don't Fear the Sweeper should be our anthem whenever the dark days of Gannon are raised!

[Edge81]

Simple straight forward response from a man personally attacked by this pathetic board.

 

Something he should not need to do, if the board had acted in the best interest of the club and not themselves in the first place.

 

The board have nothing to benefit the club when compared to Mo, this is why they cannot debate with him/about him, all they can do is fire out personal and slanderous attacks!

 

Good job that 95% of us aren't thick enough not to see this desperate act of desperation by the board!