Who is your preferred bidder?

[Robbie Earle's Perm]

Just wondered if people had a preferred bidder at the moment?

 

 

Some people have said lets go for mo, just wondering why? If anyone has a preferred bidder could you inform us as to why you made your choice please.

 

Has anyone actually bid yet?

 

If not I don't see how they can be referred to as a BIDDER!! ;)

[Leicestershire Valiant]

Totally agree. This poll is pap - voting for the mystery bidder could be a vote for the Nazi Party!!! :rolleyes:

 

We'd be wearing black shirts again soon then.

[Robbie Earle's Perm]

Bit daft being as we don't know who 4 of the 6 bidders are yet!

 

We don't know who ANY of the bidders are as NO-ONE has BID yet! :D

[Robbie Earle's Perm]

Totally agree. This poll is pap - voting for the mystery bidder could be a vote for the Nazi Party!!! :rolleyes:

 

At least we will definately be playing in black and white! :D

[Burslem Academicals]

The poll is a bit skewed....the clever,clever "wait to see some bids before I decide" is a non vote....nobody apart from the administrator will see the confidential details.

As it stands given the choices the real result of the poll is as expected with 80% wanting Mo and around 20% IPP while 1% like a mystery.

[Trentham Lakes Valiant]

The poll is a bit skewed....the clever,clever "wait to see some bids before I decide" is a non vote....nobody apart from the administrator will see the confidential details.

As it stands given the choices the real result of the poll is as expected with 80% wanting Mo and around 20% IPP while 1% like a mystery.

 

Anyone who voted for option 4 is deluding themselves if they think they will be given any details of any prospective bid.

[Nottingham Valiant]

Silly silly question

[Santa]

You can't really criticise people for choosing the fourth option.

 

It's like asking somebody if they want to form an informed opinion, a semi informed opinion or a completely misinformed opinion.

[Barcroft]

Anyone who voted for option 4 is deluding themselves if they think they will be given any details of any prospective bid.

 

I said all along, as did others, that the best thing to do is to sit back and to let the administrators choose.

 

We made the mistake of getting behind V2001, taken in by their propaganda and promises which they couldn't deliver. I have little doubt that this contributed towards the administrators decision then.

 

It's best to let those with all the facts make the choice this time round.

 

The only way I want to influence the administrators is to ensure they do not go with any option which has any connections to the old board.

 

I think you'll find most people voting for 'option 4' will have a pretty similar view, as there was no option for 'letting the administrators choose...basing their decision on all of the facts'.