Tommy Fraser

[TWIGGY]

********.

 

thats constructive

[valiant_593]

why, because of a few dodgy results?

 

Because of poor signings, regularly. Very poor tactics regularly, let's just hope he can turn it around, and fast, a couple more defeats and people will be on his back

[George]

Because of poor signings, regularly. Very poor tactics regularly, let's just hope he can turn it around, and fast, a couple more defeats and people will be on his back

 

Was it poor tactics when he had us in the top 3 for the first 6 months of last year?

 

Is loft a poor signing?

[valiant_593]

Was it poor tactics when he had us in the top 3 for the first 6 months of last year?

 

Is loft a poor signing?

 

No it wasn't and no loft was an exception and was a very good signing.

 

Are the tactics that have been used this season good?

 

Were the likes of fraser, roe, green, james, kozluk good signings, the list could go on.

[George]

No it wasn't and no loft was an exception and was a very good signing.

 

Are the tactics that have been used this season good?

 

Were the likes of fraser, roe, green, james, kozluk good signings, the list could go on.

 

In some games they have been good, in others poor. Certianly not consistantly poor as you're making out, otherwise we wouldn't have been in touching distance of the play offs all season. We'd be towrds the bottom ala Bradford.

 

I thougth Fraser was a good signing. We certainly did a lot better with him in the team then with him out of it.

 

Kozluk adds experience and versitility. Yes he's had 1 bad game but other than that i think he has been a good signing. Chilvers is another i'd add.

 

Not seen enough of the others to form judgement but they are very young, won't be on much money and could be ones for the future.

 

I like the look of Williamson and Burge is supposed to be very good but has been infortunate with injuries.

 

Adams also brought Craig Davis to the club who was an outstanding player (if a bit of an ****) but we couldn't afford to sign him permanently.

[valiant_593]

In some games they have been good, in others poor. Certianly not consistantly poor as you're making out, otherwise we wouldn't have been in touching distance of the play offs all season. We'd be towrds the bottom ala Bradford.

 

I thougth Fraser was a good signing. We certainly did a lot better with him in the team then with him out of it.

 

Kozluk adds experience and versitility. Yes he's had 1 bad game but other than that i think he has been a good signing. Chilvers is another i'd add.

 

Not seen enough of the others to form judgement but they are very young, won't be on much money and could be ones for the future.

 

I like the look of Williamson and Burge is supposed to be very good but has been infortunate with injuries.

 

Adams also brought Craig Davis to the club who was an outstanding player (if a bit of an ****) but we couldn't afford to sign him permanently.

 

Craig davies was a very good signing, real shame we couldn't get him permanently, I didn't like fraser, I know he got the players up for it but lacked anything on the pitch other than effort. For me even in games where we have won the tactics havnt been great, such as bradford at home, a very poor side which we only just beat. The point I disagree with is about kozluk, I do not rate him in any way, he does have experience but I'm still yet to see him make a tackle.

[George]

Craig davies was a very good signing, real shame we couldn't get him permanently, I didn't like fraser, I know he got the players up for it but lacked anything on the pitch other than effort. For me even in games where we have won the tactics havnt been great, such as bradford at home, a very poor side which we only just beat. The point I disagree with is about kozluk, I do not rate him in any way, he does have experience but I'm still yet to see him make a tackle.

 

It's all about opinions isn't it :D

 

I'm not going to lie, i have been a bit disappointed about how the season has gone up to now (although no where near as bad as a number of people were saying it would go) because as soon as i think we are looking like a really good team and about to go on a run i.e. after Northampton, we string together a number of really poor results and performances.

 

However, Adams did enough to impress me in his first spell here to give him some breathing space for now. If, at the end of the season, there is no improvement, no plan etc then questions could, and probably should, be asked.

[valiant_593]

It's all about opinions isn't it :D

 

I'm not going to lie, i have been a bit disappointed about how the season has gone up to now (although no where near as bad as a number of people were saying it would go) because as soon as i think we are looking like a really good team and about to go on a run i.e. after Northampton, we string together a number of really poor results and performances.

 

However, Adams did enough to impress me in his first spell here to give him some breathing space for now. If, at the end of the season, there is no improvement, no plan etc then questions could, and probably should, be asked.

 

The negativity at the start was to be granted but with adams as manager you would always expect us to be there abouts the play offs. I do think he's made mistakes tactically and in the transfer market, but he is a very good manager and if things don't go well this season I'd still keep him next year and then judge the situation :)

[TWIGGY]

Because of poor signings, regularly. Very poor tactics regularly, let's just hope he can turn it around, and fast, a couple more defeats and people will be on his back

 

we'll be fine...playoffs this season

[Seamus O'Wye]

Glad to see that "if things don't go well this season, you'd still keep him(Adams) next year," V593. Bearing in mind that he has another 2 years left on his contract and we can't afford to sack him, I'd probably have to (very reluctantly) go along with that!!!

[man in the pub]

well thats £10 of the £8 million spent