"I'm not interested in sitting in a boardroom" - MICKY ADAMS

[Tumbleweed_MVF]

Have anyone on here done everything they were asked to? The only ones who do that are brainwashed squaddies.

 

squaddies arnt brain washed they follow

 

international law

British law

military law

and the laws of the country they are serving

 

they follow orders yes are briefed on what to say only because you cant trust the press!!

 

They are far from brain washed but disciplined while doing there jobs!!

===

 

 

as for mickey he is just being a puppet for V2001

[fairportnick]

squaddies arnt brain washed they follow

 

international law

British law

military law

and the laws of the country they are serving

 

they follow orders yes are briefed on what to say only because you cant trust the press!!

 

They are far from brain washed but disciplined while doing there jobs!!

===

 

 

as for mickey he is just being a puppet for V2001

 

Hands off cocks and on with socks.

 

Of course they are brainwashed. How many ever say no to their commanding officer if they know what they are doing is wrong.

 

Lets get those boots shining so you can see your face in them.

[Fosse69]

Hands off cocks and on with socks.

 

Of course they are brainwashed. How many ever say no to their commanding officer if they know what they are doing is wrong.

 

Lets get those boots shining so you can see your face in them.

 

They may have moved on from my National Service days, but there must always be times when there is no time to think, it has to follow a drill. I doubt if they whitewash coal any more, they use gas like everybody else

[jon_1983]

Hands off cocks and on with socks.

 

Of course they are brainwashed. How many ever say no to their commanding officer if they know what they are doing is wrong.

 

Lets get those boots shining so you can see your face in them.

 

Can we get the Army to intervene in the PVFC board room? A military coup would just top off my day

[cooperpvfc]

lol @ the complete lack of understanding of the CA2006

[Andyregs]

lol @ the complete lack of understanding of the CA2006

 

Lol at your complete lack of understanding at what a state our club is in.

[cooperpvfc]

I know the state the club is in. A big mess, however misunderstanding roles of Directors and quoting irrelevant elements of the law is not going to help anyone now is it?

[Andyregs]

I know the state the club is in. A big mess, however misunderstanding roles of Directors and quoting irrelevant elements of the law is not going to help anyone now is it?

 

But you want our board to carry on. How is that going to help?

[cooperpvfc]

I don't want our board to carry on. No confidence means no confidence.

[Andyregs]

I don't want our board to carry on. No confidence means no confidence.

 

So you wanted them to lose the EGM? I may be mixing you up with someone, but Im sure you have supported change. And been patronising to those who do?

[Animal]

I know the state the club is in. A big mess, however misunderstanding roles of Directors and quoting irrelevant elements of the law is not going to help anyone now is it?

 

Explain??...not roles...responsibilities..let me hear your explanation of my misunderstanding?

[cooperpvfc]

So you wanted them to lose the EGM? I may be mixing you up with someone, but Im sure you have supported change. And been patronising to those who do?

 

I don't want the current board in charge nor do I think Mo is the future either. I have never been patronising to anyone who are advocates of change, I have however on occasion been patronising to those who think Mo is the hero in this.

 

My thoughts on Mo are relatively irrelevant anyway, come 12 months time he would have purchased the club from the administrators for £1 and rendered a hero.

 

Fortunately in 5 years time people are likely to see the true Mo

[cooperpvfc]

Explain??...not roles...responsibilities..let me hear your explanation of my misunderstanding?

 

Think about it logically. Do you really think every Director in every business is involved in the day to day running of a business?

 

I know of lots of Companies that are incorporated where an individual's wife is a director who has no interest in the commercial elements of a business whatsoever (except in relation to dividends)

 

Adams cannot actively breach those you mentioned or any fiduciary duty, not doing anything is neither here nor there. Hence the irrelevance of your point.

[Animal]

Think about it logically. Do you really think every Director in every business is involved in the day to day running of a business?

 

I know of lots of Companies that are incorporated where an individual's wife is a director who has no interest in the commercial elements of a business whatsoever (except in relation to dividends)

 

Adams cannot actively breach those you mentioned or any fiduciary duty, not doing anything is neither here nor there. Hence the irrelevance of your point.

 

No I don't...I have many clients in that situation. You are either misunderstanding my post or you don't understand the RESPONSIBILITIES of a director.

 

At no point did I mention that he had to be involved in the day to day running of the club.

 

He, does however make himself responsible for the decisions made by the company and the consequences of such decisions. Such responsibiliy requires any director to be fully aware of the progress of the business any major decisions to be made.

[Animal]

Fortunately in 5 years time people are likely to see the true Mo

 

So tell us, in your infinite wisdom, what that is!?