Should Mo, sue for slander!!!

[butt lane vale fan]

Simple question really and perhaps LB could advise, but could Mo start to sue these idiots for all the comments they are making about him. What with the comments from Jackson and Plant ect, surely there must be a case. Personally I'd love to see the scum bags made to squirm.

[the old bycars tea bar]

at some stage i think all this will end in court, very sad situation

[butt lane vale fan]

Basically, yes.

 

"The banks won't deal with him" probably being the biggest one.

 

Thats the thing though Doha, and Leagle Beagle, please don't take this as a criticism, but it just seems as though Mo is allowing them to continue to slander him. Personally he must be fuming at everything that is being said, and I just wish he would grab them by the balls and take them for everything he can. Perhaps he is waiting for suitable time, I don't know, but I'm just getting totally frustraited, as it like fighting fires at the moment!!!

[suge1w]

Taking them to court for this would give them ammo to use in the future im afraid. The best thing Mo can do is rise above it and bide his time because it will come sooner rather than later.

[X-Valiant]

Simple question really and perhaps LB could advise, but could Mo start to sue these idiots for all the comments they are making about him. What with the comments from Jackson and Plant ect, surely there must be a case. Personally I'd love to see the scum bags made to squirm.

 

Wouldnt it be great if Plant got sued for exactly the same money Port Vale had to pay him when he sued Bill Bratt

[The Man in the Stand]

Taking them to court for this would give them ammo to use in the future im afraid. The best thing Mo can do is rise above it and bide his time because it will come sooner rather than later.

 

I wish you would ditch that avatar ===

[suge1w]

I wish you would ditch that avatar ===

 

Better? :D

[The Man in the Stand]

Better? :D

 

Thank you.... Thank you.... every time I saw his smirking face I wanted to chuck the laptop through the window Cheers :D

[Markie G]

Sueing for the bank comment !!!! are you lot being serious. No wonder the board never says anything. People constantly want the board to say something but when they do all you can hear is sue sue sue

[Markie G]

You are a silly billy aren't you.

 

Mo is a business man. Saying "Banks want nothing to do with him" damages his professional reputation.

 

And before you say it works both ways, it doesn't. The board are neither actual business men or professional in the slightest. They are liars who deserve every negative comment they get.

 

So its ok to call them liars. Did they not say our bank? its seems a waste of Money to sue them over a comment about a bank will not work with them.

[EggChaserValiant]

i dont know enough about the chaudry bid, and iv said it a few times now, but is no one else in any way suspicious of his motives? i know i am. why on earth would he want to put money into the vale, it makes no sense

[VantaaVale]

i dont know enough about the chaudry bid, and iv said it a few times now, but is no one else in any way suspicious of his motives? i know i am. why on earth would he want to put money into the vale, it makes no sense

 

That kind of comment drives me mad!!

 

If you don't know enough about the bid, why make an opinion on it! Take the time to understand what the bid is first and then decide. All you're saying is you don't trust Mo but you don't know why!

[EggChaserValiant]

in fairness, i recon i there is reason to mistrust him. everyone in the potteries seems very wary of him.

i would love nothing more than a wealthy businesman to come in and splash money and the vale, and to see it ran properly. and to see us fly up the leagues and entertain some quality football in burslem! can you not see why someone such as myself would be suspicious?

[Guest Aub]

I'll let Mo speak for himself.

 

"...All IFAs’ were subsequently required to review retrospectively all pension business transacted from 1988 to 1993 but the reviews were to be conducted based on the changed framework and compliance rules, a wholly unfair and inequitable situation. This review resulted in some Pension cases not being deemed compliant based on the changed rules and regulations. Any such cases were compensated fully by the Investors compensation scheme..."

[VantaaVale]

What reason? It seems to me that people who are out to discredit him disappear back into the woodwork when they are asked to provide evidence.

 

And I think you may be just slightly exaggerating with the comment about "everyone in the Potteries".

 

I wish people would just look at the bid for what it is and not always dismiss it out of hand because of Chinese whispers, none of which have been proven.

 

And again, what of Mark Sims? A lifelong Vale fan who is willing to put a minimum of half a million quid in! Do you think he would do this if he didn't trust Mo?