Loggerheads Sage

I can understand their anger though. Var seems to go against the same clubs match after match. Wolves have similarly suffered. The liverpool game ( ref gave the ball to liverpool when forest were in possession), ivan toney moving the ball for that free kick etc. One of those penalties was a stonewaller. When you are fighting like hell against relegation ( unlike us), it must make you as mad as hell. Absolute incompetence

Don't think Coventry can complain about var. Their " goal" WAS offside, narrowly, but offside. The handball for the equaliser was much more subjective. Almost identical to the forest incident , which wasn't given . If the 2 referee's had given opposite decisions, I don't think var would have overturned those decisions. Obviously Coventry aren't used to var and would have won without it, but they knew it would be used. If the offside goal would have stood, would that be right, would there have been an outcry? I suspect not because the opposition was Manchester United.

That was my first thought, but on reflection, I think that would be very disrespectful to Ben and Chis, who both got double figures from midfield in a very poor team. Chis also got ( I think) 7 assists. If only we had 1 striker who could match those figures.

I've thought that for the last 3 windows!!! Got to be right one day, hopefully

He was right though, we DID need to be the fittest club in the league. Unfortunately we were probably the unfittest.

No, you're not saying we played a player out of position surely? Lol. We never do that

Sorry mate, past caring about this. Was proud of it at one stage, embarrassing now. Port vale FOOTBALL CLUB

2 nil up v stevenage in the cup and lost. Not 4 2, but lost, cost us mega bucks. Will never know re Crosby, but I do think the players were fighting for him. Real culprit, well we all know the answer to that one. The January transfer window was just unreal

Always seems to be to be many many more stewards than there used to be. Probably even more post Ted

That was my first thought . Hoping it's tactical to nullify them

That was the scoreboard, not the pitch. But the capital costs still have to be repaid every month Pitch was that bad , it simply had to get sorted.

I've no knowledge, but why would he have put that amount in without control of the club? Doesnt make sense. If he is after them, I agree, that would be a disaster for a decent club. Would the EFL allow him to own another club after the disgraceful way he acted with us? Who knows with that shower of <ovf censored>

I think that's right, I just wonder about the players reactions. There seemed almost an anger from some when Crosby went, as if to say it's not him that should have gone. There did appear a distinct lack of fight, unlike now. So from that way of looking at it, it could be partly down to him belatedly going. Doing much better now, just hamstrung by the lack of quality up front. With a decent striker, it would have been 6 points , but 1, from the last 2 games. Still struggling to get my head around 6 games v shrews, Cheltenham and Fleetwood, bringing just 1 point. 2 wins, 2 draws and 2 defeats would have seen us nearly in mid table. Shocking really. 3 sides in the bottom 6, excluding us

Well, I did say national league or L2. I don't know what the financial risk is as I'm not privy to Wilson's contract details. I'd assumed that as he was released and had not got fixed up, we negotiated a more realistic deal, along the lines of a low basic wage along with a higher play/ goals bonus? Could be wrong because, as I said , I have no information whatsoever as to his contract details. Some sublime moments off him, but I think this ship has sailed now personally

Surely he will get fixed up at national league level, if not L2?