Clarity required from sc and b&g

[butt lane vale fan]

so the goal for the pro change groups is still for the total removal of the current board or am i reading wrong?

 

if there is to be compromise then what will be accepted?

clarity is required still i feel by all

 

have the supporters club commitee got an agreed guideline of how they communicate with the board and what is the agenda of that communication, the view i had from the last meeting at badderlygreen was that the vast majority were still very anti board, the agreement was that the board would come back to the supporters and communicate the deal and allow discussion as part of an effort to regain trust

 

so perhaps dave should have politely turned down the invite but saying that i trust dave so it maybe be better to have him at least involved in some way bearing in mind he holds robbies proxy

 

i'm very sorry it seems i'm rambling but i'm confused.com

 

What worries me OBTB is, will the desire to remove the entire board and the refusal to accept compromise work against us.

For example, say Blue Sky get wind, that the club is really in turmoil and fans are protesting, will they decide to run a mile. If that happens and we go back to square one with SEO, trying to force them out, how long before Administration. What happens if Jackson then gets his grubby hands on the club.

Ok we could take a chance on Mo, trying to buy us out, but no guarantee's.

Ok, I know, the current situation is not ideal, things need to change and we need answers regarding Blue Sky. However think about how far we've come since last year. At the moment I've got hope of a brighter future, could that be destroyed through stubbornness and hatred towards the past regime.

[Jacko51]

good god people what the funk is going on ?

 

jimmy , dean, dave f , jacko , timothius, sv and many more arguing your backsides off between yourselves .

 

Who was I arguing with? I must have missed that.

[Trentham Lakes Valiant]

so the goal for the pro change groups is still for the total removal of the current board or am i reading wrong?

 

if there is to be compromise then what will be accepted?

 

clarity is required still i feel by all

 

have the supporters club commitee got an agreed guideline of how they communicate with the board and what is the agenda of that communication, the view i had from the last meeting at badderlygreen was that the vast majority were still very anti board, the agreement was that the board would come back to the supporters and communicate the deal and allow discussion as part of an effort to regain trust

 

so perhaps dave should have politely turned down the invite but saying that i trust dave so it maybe be better to have him at least involved in some way bearing in mind he holds robbies proxy

 

i'm very sorry it seems i'm rambling but i'm confused.com

 

I suggest you pay a visit to the B&G website

[Trentham Lakes Valiant]

Any visit to the B&G website will give our up to date position. As far as I know, we are still waiting for such information from the SC.

[Burslem Academicals]

It seems that the B&G are watching and waiting and the protest is only on temporary hold....Mo Chaudry continues to watch with interest

and the SEO look back in anger....in short these answers better be soon and they better be good.

[the old bycars tea bar]

Thanks simon

I will also be watching and waiting,the actions of the next few weeks should be intresting if nothing else

 

It just worries me that at all the supporter groups are not unified in their views and goals

 

This was something I think should have happened,i know benners on pvo was saying much the same a while back

[BIRCHES HEAD WHITES]

jacko51, we will can argue over whether or not you argued with someone if you wish ?

[Jacko51]

jacko51, we will can argue over whether or not you argued with someone if you wish ?

 

Don't want to. I just didn't think I'd argued with anyone on here -just answered questions?

[Stone Valiant]

What worries me OBTB is, will the desire to remove the entire board and the refusal to accept compromise work against us.

For example, say Blue Sky get wind, that the club is really in turmoil and fans are protesting, will they decide to run a mile. If that happens and we go back to square one with SEO, trying to force them out, how long before Administration. What happens if Jackson then gets his grubby hands on the club.

Ok we could take a chance on Mo, trying to buy us out, but no guarantee's.

Ok, I know, the current situation is not ideal, things need to change and we need answers regarding Blue Sky. However think about how far we've come since last year. At the moment I've got hope of a brighter future, could that be destroyed through stubbornness and hatred towards the past regime.

 

A sensible man with a sensible post!

[Jacko51]

What worries me OBTB is, will the desire to remove the entire board and the refusal to accept compromise work against us.

For example, say Blue Sky get wind, that the club is really in turmoil and fans are protesting, will they decide to run a mile. If that happens and we go back to square one with SEO, trying to force them out, how long before Administration. What happens if Jackson then gets his grubby hands on the club.

Ok we could take a chance on Mo, trying to buy us out, but no guarantee's.

Ok, I know, the current situation is not ideal, things need to change and we need answers regarding Blue Sky. However think about how far we've come since last year. At the moment I've got hope of a brighter future, could that be destroyed through stubbornness and hatred towards the past regime.

 

Agreed.

[BIRCHES HEAD WHITES]

blvf, nothing will be destroyed by anyone , so long as everyone gets the REAL facts and all grey areas are cleared up re blue sky.

[the old bycars tea bar]

What worries me OBTB is, will the desire to remove the entire board and the refusal to accept compromise work against us.

For example, say Blue Sky get wind, that the club is really in turmoil and fans are protesting, will they decide to run a mile. If that happens and we go back to square one with SEO, trying to force them out, how long before Administration. What happens if Jackson then gets his grubby hands on the club.

Ok we could take a chance on Mo, trying to buy us out, but no guarantee's.

Ok, I know, the current situation is not ideal, things need to change and we need answers regarding Blue Sky. However think about how far we've come since last year. At the moment I've got hope of a brighter future, could that be destroyed through stubbornness and hatred towards the past regime.

 

Great post mate sorry missed it earlier

 

The problem though is whilst a number of us are willing to watch and wait I get the impression that others will not accept nothing but total change at the club including the removal of lloyd and deakin, and bluesky not investing no matter what the detail of the deal entails

 

My hope is somehow mark sims comes on board it's the only way I see this moving forward with most people united

[BIRCHES HEAD WHITES]

tobtb, i agree wholeheartedly on the sims point , he is pivotal in many respects regarding change and progress for many. whilst i personally would like both lloyd and deakin removed i am a realist but would like to see sims in situ (as i trust his judgement) with the potential of further investment from other parties pursued.

[the old bycars tea bar]

tobtb, i agree wholeheartedly on the sims point , he is pivotal in many respects regarding change and progress for many. whilst i personally would like both lloyd and deakin removed i am a realist but would like to see sims in situ (as i trust his judgement) with the potential of further investment from other parties pursued.

 

totally agree

 

regarding lloyd and deakin it's all about regaining trust or being tarred with the same brush, regarding not meeting the fans as promised they have not made a good start in regaining that trust