onevalefan.co.uk Present Past Specials About Forum
Jump to content
onevalefan.co.uk forum

Advert


Advert


Fosse69

Moderators
  • Posts

    26,036
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    10

Posts posted by Fosse69

  1. Just now, Seamus O'Wye said:

    I suspect that some of the people who won't be attending this game 'because of the price' are choosing not to attend because Middlesboro are not much of an attraction. I'm sure that if we had drawn Man U or Liverpool, the money would be flying out of their pockets, their attendance would be guaranteed and there would be umpteen complaints from others about not being able to get a ticket!                                                                                                                                  That's my opinion and I'm sticking to it... feel free to disagree if you wish to, but I definitely won't be getting into a discussion/argument about it !!

     

    The League Cup is not usually a budget factor after August never mind at Xmas. Problem of success, especially if we are still in 3 cups on Xmas day.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  2. 4 minutes ago, princesslear said:

    Will the same happen to all the clubs' fans that cover their football teams games then???

    I assume it is the amount of match content and the profile of the site that would be the problem. I have not seen any recent statement by a club or any of the football authorities.

  3. 10 minutes ago, mr.hobblesworth said:

    Yes, completely. Why should this 7 year old feel that he can break the law with impunity?

    Hopefully, Suella Braverman's brave proposals to reintroduce public floggings and the workhouse (if not scuppered by the toke) will mean that the likes of Alf and his family will get the comeuppance they deserve. 

    I blame the parents, they should know the law relating to copyright on YouTube. Not fair to put the blame on the lad

    • Like 1
  4. 15 minutes ago, Guitar Ray said:

    Fair comment but from what can see there now appears to be zero Vale coverage in the “local” newspaper online, as in a total news black out.  There’s no justification whatsoever for this when there is still local cricket and other sports being covered and nobody will convince me it’s a good thing from a Vale perspective for the scrotes down the road to have a complete monopoly.  At a basic level the casual reader should at least be able to read a match report and the odd interview.  If they want to put the “in depth” analysis behind a paywall then fine but as it stands you could look at the Sentinel online and not even know Vale exist.

    Economics I suspect, as the Vale coverage decreased so have the clicks, becomes a downward spiral until the clicks disappear. Yield on articles  becomes  non existent.

  5. Just get the info elsewhere. Everything is available much quicker online. Makes no sense to me. 
    Lots of newspapers do it now, a daily news digest to your email or wherever. Quality journalism comes at a price usually behind a paywall or subscription. If people want to pay for it, what is the problem? It is usually far cheaper than buying a physical newspaper. It will either be economic or not.

    Sent from my SM-A715F using onevalefan mobile app

    • Like 2
  6. 6 minutes ago, Brian Johnson said:

    For someone that's not subscribed, what was different with what you read to comapared to anything on here, through official Port Vale channels and Radio Stoke?

    Based on one read. A lengthy match report  of the Bolton game by Badders similar to what I used to read in the Sentinel. Since I haven't bought a Sentinel this Century and no longer battle through their on line advertising £10 appears a reasonable fee for me. After a year,  whether £40 is value for 50 odd games  plus whatever else is included, can be decided.

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...