Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advert:


  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Email to the EFL. Sir, I would like some explanation as to why Gary Bowyer, manager of a team which dropped seven points during the month, including a home defeat, has been awarded League Two Man

Here is my reply from the EFL: Hello Jean, Thank you for your email. The Manager of the Month is shortlisted by experts in the industry and a judging panel will then decide on the

It has been awarded on the basis of a last minute goal against Bradford to win in their EIGHTH game of the month.  Salford dropped seven points, we dropped two.  I am in the process of writing a stron

Posted Images

To be fair we did only win 5 out of 6, and we did let in 1 goal - shocking form.

An absolute travesty - what the hell is the criteria? Friends in high places?

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Email to the EFL.
Sir, I would like some explanation as to why Gary Bowyer, manager of a team which dropped seven points during the month, including a home defeat, has been awarded League Two Manager of the Month for April.  The record of Port Vale's Darrell Clarke, whose team dropped only two points and conceded only one goal in their six games, is clearly superior.  The fact that Salford played two more games to get one more point than Vale should not make their record worthy of the award. 

I would be interested to know the criteria used to establish the winner of this award.  If it is simply the number of points obtained irrespective of the number of games played, I would politely suggest that your criteria are ridiculous and should be reviewed in the light of such an anomaly.  Also, why do you need a panel of “experts” to decide on the award if you are simply going to give the prize on the basis of points obtained rather than any analysis of other factors such as number of games played or the position and form of the team prior to the start of the month?  You will recall that the final positions in League Two last season were established on the basis of points-per-game.  Using that principle, Clarke’s record during April is clearly superior to Bowyer’s – 2.67 points per game against 2.13.  I find it hard to understand why points-per-game is acceptable one minute but not the next.

Clarke has produced a miraculous turn around at Port Vale in April, his record in the month being part of a run of eight wins from nine games which took the club from relegation strugglers to the top half of the table.  It included April wins against promotion chasing Exeter and Morecambe in contrast to Salford’s inability to win a home game against soon to be relegated Grimsby.   In this case, Salford and Bowyer have benefitted from having games postponed earlier in the season and needing to catch up in April. 

To any fan with a modicum of common sense the April League Two trophy has been awarded erroneously and the Football League should consider how it comes to its decisions in future.  Just because Salford City FC is a club with a high profile in the media this should not make any difference to a fair analysis of its performance.

I await your response with interest.

Excellent post Jacko..
  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps they looked at which team had been on a poor run previously. Oh yeh that was us so that makes  our Managers achievement even more noteworthy.  But hey who in the EFL would look at evidence like that. No one it would appear. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advert:


4 hours ago, Wrex said:

Well we lost against Barrow so it's struck regardless

 

edit: I mean Grimsby!

Was a great goal in the Barrow away game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Jacko51 said:

Email to the EFL.

Sir, I would like some explanation as to why Gary Bowyer, manager of a team which dropped seven points during the month, including a home defeat, has been awarded League Two Manager of the Month for April.  The record of Port Vale's Darrell Clarke, whose team dropped only two points and conceded only one goal in their six games, is clearly superior.  The fact that Salford played two more games to get one more point than Vale should not make their record worthy of the award. 

 

I would be interested to know the criteria used to establish the winner of this award.  If it is simply the number of points obtained irrespective of the number of games played, I would politely suggest that your criteria are ridiculous and should be reviewed in the light of such an anomaly.  Also, why do you need a panel of “experts” to decide on the award if you are simply going to give the prize on the basis of points obtained rather than any analysis of other factors such as number of games played or the position and form of the team prior to the start of the month?  You will recall that the final positions in League Two last season were established on the basis of points-per-game.  Using that principle, Clarke’s record during April is clearly superior to Bowyer’s – 2.67 points per game against 2.13.  I find it hard to understand why points-per-game is acceptable one minute but not the next.

 

Clarke has produced a miraculous turn around at Port Vale in April, his record in the month being part of a run of eight wins from nine games which took the club from relegation strugglers to the top half of the table.  It included April wins against promotion chasing Exeter and Morecambe in contrast to Salford’s inability to win a home game against soon to be relegated Grimsby.   In this case, Salford and Bowyer have benefitted from having games postponed earlier in the season and needing to catch up in April. 

 

To any fan with a modicum of common sense the April League Two trophy has been awarded erroneously and the Football League should consider how it comes to its decisions in future.  Just because Salford City FC is a club with a high profile in the media this should not make any difference to a fair analysis of its performance.

 

I await your response with interest.

 

I sent them an email a couple of years ago when I think it was Page who should have won. Their response was laughable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advert:


25 minutes ago, ginge said:

I sent them an email a couple of years ago when I think it was Page who should have won. Their response was laughable. 

What was their response?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The EFL sucking up to Gary neville after all his outbursts about the super league, but how Salford been with managers this season is shocking. Clarke and the team deserved recognition for the run we had.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Somebody coined the phrase "Salford w.nkfest" on Salford City's Twitter post about Bowyer's award. I could not have found a better description for all the fawning over Salford myself

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, DaneValiant said:

Somebody coined the phrase "Salford w.nkfest" on Salford City's Twitter post about Bowyer's award. I could not have found a better description for all the fawning over Salford myself

It would be a great name for a band. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Advert:


Maybe they’ll say we had a vibe he would come unstuck at the steamrolling Grimsby. They’re such footballing experts that they know results before they come in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, krakaddict said:

It would be a great name for a band. 

 

1 minute ago, Aguar61 said:

Sounds like one of Mark E. Smiths phrases

 

1 hour ago, krakaddict said:

It would be a great name for a band. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Reporting Posts and Ignoring Users

    Moderators don't read everything. Don't assume we'll spot rule breaking (e.g. personal abuse) - use the orange report button above a post to alert them.

    If you can't get on with another forum user you can select the "ignore" option. Simply click on the link below, type in their username and save - Click here

    Please check with site staff if you wish to sell, auction or raffle any items on here. We are very happy to support good causes but do ask you to check with us first - Contact us here




×
×
  • Create New...