bending the rules?

[Fosse69]

1 hour ago, geoff1 said:

im meaning on the pitch!!!!!!!!!!!

The police can take action on illegal activities within the ground including the pitch, but footballing matters rest with the FA, the various leagues, and the PFA.

[newchapel valiant]

I think subs should not be allowed after 80 mins to stop time wasting, even if someone is injured you carry on with what you have left. 

[Coyney Valiant]

45 minutes ago, wotsyobeef said:

To encourage attacking play I would like goals scored to be used again as the decider if points tallies are equal. Whilst good defensive play is a key part of the game we are gonna score more than you games are much more exciting. Also maybe awarding a bonus point for every 5 goals scored over 80 in a season.


I would also like to see time wasting tallied in a game without holding up play. Something like the ref waving a pink card in the air without talking to anyone. This could be tallied over a season and a point deducted for every 5 or used before goals scored to decide position if points tallies are equal.


If a player is sent off against you, you should be able to choose the game(s) that the player is banned for.

We don’t want to go down the road of bonus points it’s made rugby a bit of a farce 

[vallyunt]

What about ref's applying normal rules when a player is 'shielding' a ball out of play.

No matter what a player does in an attempt to get the ball the 'shielder' always get's the decision even if he has shoved his backside into a player attempting to get the ball. Anywhere else on the pitch it's a free kick for obstruction. 

[geoff1]

35 minutes ago, vallyunt said:

What about ref's applying normal rules when a player is 'shielding' a ball out of play.

No matter what a player does in an attempt to get the ball the 'shielder' always get's the decision even if he has shoved his backside into a player attempting to get the ball. Anywhere else on the pitch it's a free kick for obstruction. 

 

35 minutes ago, vallyunt said:

What about ref's applying normal rules when a player is 'shielding' a ball out of play.

No matter what a player does in an attempt to get the ball the 'shielder' always get's the decision even if he has shoved his backside into a player attempting to get the ball. Anywhere else on the pitch it's a free kick for obstruction. 

 

36 minutes ago, vallyunt said:

What about ref's applying normal rules when a player is 'shielding' a ball out of play.

No matter what a player does in an attempt to get the ball the 'shielder' always get's the decision even if he has shoved his backside into a player attempting to get the ball. Anywhere else on the pitch it's a free kick for obstruction. 

too true!