Isn't today judgement day?

[sheffieldclayhead]

Believe we will be in Admin before any AGM or EGM, this is their plan.

[Aussie Rules]

It is the Club's policy to respond to customers within seven working days and this will be done either by telephone or letter.If it is not possible to provide a full response within this period then an acknowledgement will be issued and a full response given within a further fourteen days.

 

Does ML know about this policy?

[valetillidye]

i believe this to be the fact at the moment at no time have the board publically responded to the egm request

 

down right disgusting in my eyes

 

they'll deny having seen it

[Phil]

Birdy

Senior Member

Join Date: Oct 2003

Location: Norf Landan

Posts: 4,194 If the AGM is the 13th March does the club have to send out the AGM documentation 21 days prior, which is not today?

 

21 days before the AGM is next Tuesday, not today.

[Burslem Academicals]

Sorry but the club recieved the EGM paperwork on the 26th which must have been recorded delivery and have witnesses so they had up to 21 days....which was up to close of play yesterday....it is now in the hands of the Supporters club therefore to set a time,place and venue.

The one thing that is certain is that if the Board had wanted the EGM on the same day as the AGM they will have had to call it before the 21 days were up....even if the Board called the EGM yesterday it would have to be a 28 day notice therefore after the AGM....unless they are going to move the AGM back for a third time.

[markymark]

Rumour is that the board believe the EGM regquest isn't lawful an have sought legal advice on this. I think they are looking at technicalities here.

 

I didn't believe this story when I was told it, but now with no news it makes it more believeable.

[cheeky]

Rumour is that the board believe the EGM regquest isn't lawful an have sought legal advice on this. I think they are looking at technicalities here.

 

I didn't believe this story when I was told it, but now with no news it makes it more believeable.

 

And who told you this? It's funny how you always appear in the run up to such events, with your pro-board propoganda.

[Burslem Academicals]

Rumour is that the board believe the EGM regquest isn't lawful an have sought legal advice on this. I think they are looking at technicalities here.

 

I didn't believe this story when I was told it, but now with no news it makes it more believeable.

 

An EGM request from shareholders is legal and company law....are the Board really going to challlenge company law...who will pay for such a massive historic law suit.

[Edge81]

They HAVE to announce it today!

 

The same day as they'll announce the signing of Chris Birchall. Not that I'm a cynic of course...

 

He's playing for FREE the board get no praise in this! If they signed him on a long term deal even I'd be ****** that they did have the money after all. They get no praise or any glory from this!

[markymark]

And who told you this? It's funny how you always appear in the run up to such events, with your pro-board propoganda.

 

I take offence to that comment as it is not true.

[cheeky]

I take offence to that comment as it is not true.

 

I take offence to your comment on the "solution" thread, which is not true.

[Timothius]

Rumour is that the board believe the EGM regquest isn't lawful an have sought legal advice on this. I think they are looking at technicalities here.

 

I didn't believe this story when I was told it, but now with no news it makes it more believeable.

 

The same trick they tried last time and failed.

[markymark]

The same trick they tried last time and failed.

 

Did they? I thought it was held as it should have been?

[Howjy04]

Did they? I thought it was held as it should have been?

 

That means that they failed.

[ancient mariner]

The same trick they tried last time and failed.

 

Excellent record when it comes to failure,

both this and the previous board.

The sooner they do one,the better.