onevalefan.co.uk Present Past Specials About Forum
Jump to content
onevalefan.co.uk forum

Advert


Advert


Jim Gannon Statement


valerule4ever

Recommended Posts

Advert

I thought he would of been good manager if we appointed him at the start of the season, but because we were in the play offs and looking for promotion I thought it would be a really hard job to take over and get us promoted because he didn't know the players and it does take time to generate relationships and that was something we didn't have at the period of the season... the club was worried about the short term future of the club not the long term, in truth you were the man for long term.

Good luck Jim, good ideas, hope you get a club that respects your style and development which I did when you arrived at the club.

 

Are you his love child?

 

A man who signs a player who cant jump, cant tackle, cant run and cant get on with any of his team deserves all he got from vale. Good riddance Gannon you delusional clown!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the lesson there Tim, I was aware of all those things, I haven't just woken up from a 5 month long sleep...

 

I'm aware we had a cracking defence.

 

I'm aware there were off the field problems in December/January (Rotherham/Gillingham).

 

But any manager going into a club having had a recent defensive record as bad as ours would look to sort it out.

 

That's all I'm saying!! Not saying we were bad before Gannon, not saying Gannon is God, not saying we were terrible at the back all season, just arguing against you saying the defence didn't need sorting.

 

And it did, as we'd just gone on a bad defensive run (for whatever reasons).

 

But that is the point Burt we hadn't gone on a bad defensive run! We lost 1-0 hardly a tonking. We then lost 3-0 when the teams and managers mind were on other things and them 5 at Rotherham with 10 men, after that we were back on track

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But that is the point Burt we hadn't gone on a bad defensive run! We lost 1-0 hardly a tonking. We then lost 3-0 when the teams and managers mind were on other things and them 5 at Rotherham with 10 men, after that we were back on track

 

If we hadn't lost 3 and 5 nil in those 2 games he would have done exactly the same as he did I'm certain of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest middnight

He is rather full of himself!

 

As it's been said before he probably is a good manager to bring to a team that are bottom of the table with not much hope. However we just needed someone to keep us going and on top form, not make too many changes.

Geohaghon was never an addition to the defence, he was a hindrance.

 

Also the statement he made was posted by Sky Sports News but it's not appearing now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the lesson there Tim, I was aware of all those things, I haven't just woken up from a 5 month long sleep...

 

I'm aware we had a cracking defence.

 

I'm aware there were off the field problems in December/January (Rotherham/Gillingham).

 

But any manager going into a club having had a recent defensive record as bad as ours would look to sort it out.

 

That's all I'm saying!! Not saying we were bad before Gannon, not saying Gannon is God, not saying we were terrible at the back all season, just arguing against you saying the defence didn't need sorting.

 

And it did, as we'd just gone on a bad defensive run (for whatever reasons).

 

Again - and sorry if you think I'm stalking you - stop spouting this rubbish, you sound like an idiot. A blip is all it was - perhaps the odd tweak at the most was needed to sort it out - your mate Gannon ripped the freaking engine out....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again - and sorry if you think I'm stalking you - stop spouting this rubbish, you sound like an idiot. A blip is all it was - perhaps the odd tweak at the most was needed to sort it out - your mate Gannon ripped the freaking engine out....

 

I don't disagree. You're reading too much into what I put.

 

Someone said the defence didn't need looking at at all.

 

I said it did, which you've agreed with. The end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Reporting Posts and other information

    Rules - This forum is moderated but the admin team don't read everything. Don't assume we'll spot rule breaking and alert us by reporting content. Logged in users can hover over the post and click the orange button. Guests can contact us here. If you don't get on with another user you can "ignore" them. Click this link, type in their username and click save. Please check with the admin team if you wish to sell/auction any items. We're happy to support good causes but check first.

    Use - This forum may not be suitable for all as it may contain words or phrases not considered appropriate for some. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and could face legal action should it contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. Please do not reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: phone number, address or email address). This forum is not in any way affiliated with Port Vale FC. OVF reserve the right to edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason. If you spot an offensive post please report it to the admin team (instructions are above).

    Adverts - This site occasionally a) has adverts and sponsored features about gambling b) accepts sponsored posts from third parties. If you require help and advice on gambling read these links: Information on protecting young people | Addiction help from gambleaware.co.uk
  • Friends of OVF

×
×
  • Create New...