Jump to content

Coronavirus


robf

Recommended Posts

My wife has been tested. Wait to see the result. She is a manager working near COVID-19 wards and associating with clinical staff as part of her work and use of facilities etc. There is an attempt now to make hospitals COVID-19 safe workplaces. In my view that is impossible in a hospital working properly at capacity. Instructions like one person in a lift will bring the places to a complete halt. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Warren said:

My wife has been tested. Wait to see the result. She is a manager working near COVID-19 wards and associating with clinical staff as part of her work and use of facilities etc. There is an attempt now to make hospitals COVID-19 safe workplaces. In my view that is impossible in a hospital working properly at capacity. Instructions like one person in a lift will bring the places to a complete halt. 

There have always been isolation wards/hospitals,  Why would you need more than one properly dressed  person  with a patient on a trolley or wheel chair? What would be the problem with a properly dressed second person?  Most large hospitals will have to be divided up to cater for ongoing Coronavirus over the coming months/years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, geosname said:

Because the palace of Westminster has it's own child care facilities.

I would expect our "leaders" to lead by example.

Gerrymandering  the vote by not allowing MPs  unable to attend  not being allowed to vote electronically as at present.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Nofinikea said:

 

Some politicians are in parliment though arent they and have been for some time.  Some kids are starting back to school today.

Why is it odd?

Because as with Parliament, there has been a number of pupils in school throughout this crisis.  Now three year groups are being asked to return to school but no extras are being allowed in Parliament.  Why not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jacko51 said:

Because as with Parliament, there has been a number of pupils in school throughout this crisis.  Now three year groups are being asked to return to school but no extras are being allowed in Parliament.  Why not?

The kids will behave better.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Nofinikea said:

Because it would entail lots of MPs travelling many miles from different areas?  Maybe.

It's perfectly OK for people in government and Parliament to travel where the hell they like and claim the Cummings precedent.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Great article from the British Journal of Medicine.

It states (in Bold below) that this model of easing lockdown wasn’t one of the 9 scenarios the government modelled... why would then suddenly change tactics? 

Maybe to cover up the mess it’s made and try and distract the public (see second bold paragraph)

 

https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m2102

England is abandoning lockdown and possibly hope of containing a second wave of covid-19. From 1 June schools will open to children other than those of key workers. Outdoor markets and car showrooms will reopen. In two weeks, it will be the turn of all non-essential retailers. This is meant to be a moment of optimism, a green recovery, centred on the health of people and the planet (doi:10.1136/bmj.m2077, doi:10.1136/bmj.m2076), backed by an effective system of testing and contact tracing and possibly informed by a public inquiry (doi:10.1136/bmj.m2052).

Instead, England arrives here in a state of utter confusion (doi:10.1136/bmj.m1785). The public’s confidence in the official lockdown advice is shaken. The covid-19 response is short on testing, uncertain on contact tracing, and reliant on unreliable apps (doi:10.1136/bmj.m2085). Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland are not following England’s lead. The UK has the second highest number of covid-19 deaths of any nation and, by some calculations, the most deaths per capita.

England’s decisions seem rooted in a desire to restart the economy rather than an overabundance of science (doi:10.1136/bmj.m1847, doi:10.1136/bmj.m2045), an important aim except that it may backfire unless properly timed and with the right systems in place. Easing lockdown requires professional as well as public backing, and the decision on schools is opposed by teaching unions concerned about the lack of a proper system of test, trace and isolate.

These concerns are shared by the Independent Scientific Advisory Group for Emergenices (iSAGE), whose open meeting on 22 May and paper on school reopening recommend waiting until mid-June to reduce risks (doi:10.1136/bmj.m2079). The government published its own scientific advice soon after, although curiously its chosen method of reopening is not one of the nine scenarios modelled (https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/may/22/ministers-rejected-school-reopening-plan-recommended-by-sage-experts).

Transparency and political interference in scientific advice was controversial even before a trip to Durham by Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s senior aide. It seems incredible that Dominic Cummings, who attended the government’s scientific advisory committee and plays a key role in the pandemic response, thought it reasonable to carry covid-19 from London to a region of lower infectivity and into a local hospital.

Johnson’s darkest hour, his decision to essentially prioritise Cummings over the pandemic response, had at least three immediate effects. First and foremost, it seriously damaged public trust and goodwill in complying with lockdown measures, risking a deadlier next wave of infection. Second, it belittled staff and patients who have risen to complex logistic, clinical and personal challenges while delivering care (doi:10.1136/bmj.m2043, doi:10.1136/bmj.m2055, doi:10.1136/bmj.m2062, doi:10.1136/bmj.m1987). Third, it forced the government’s scientific advisers into open dissent (doi:10.1136/bmj.m2109).

Scientists and doctors in advisory positions face a dual obligation to the state and to the public. But what happens when the government’s integrity no longer matches your personal or professional integrity, when your public accountability seems greater than that of the politicians you advise? Do you fight from within? Do you speak out, and even resign? What of the leaders of medical organisations working closely with the government? Regrettably, questions of conscience and duty must now be addressed

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Err on the side of caution is my motto at present.  Stay at home has not changed, why such a vast range of shielded cases were told it was OK out of the blue, it  was not a medical decision. Most people affected will be careful I am sure, purely a gimmick in my mind.  Happy Monday is a very big risk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Fosse69 said:

Err on the side of caution is my motto at present.  Stay at home has not changed, why such a vast range of shielded cases were told it was OK out of the blue, it  was not a medical decision. Most people affected will be careful I am sure, purely a gimmick in my mind.  Happy Monday is a very big risk.

Spot on Fosse. What is the methodology being employed by the Government. More lies today on the Propaganda show,  as Hancock just like his boss, stuttered and bluffed his way through, Track and Trace another in a long list of lies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it odd you can have sex with your lodger but not your neighbour?..... or at least you can't do it indoors but you can outdoors.

There are new rules about what you can't do on/in your own property but the police have no power under corona virus rules to enter your garden or house to enforce them...... I suspect that little mistake will soon be circumvented by the ever creative thin blue line....." there is someone inside who reportedly/we suspect has covid 19" and we need to isolate them for testing?..... imminent danger/threat?....... terror threat?..... etc etc

You can travel any distance you want (in England)  but you can't stay anywhere overnight..... which poses several questions..... do I have to continue driving if I have an eyesight problem?...... what is the legal/police definition of overnight?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Under data protection rules a full impact assessment must be carried out before implementation..... there has been no assessment done on track and trace.

In NI information gathered by track and trace could be used for 2 years after the pandemic.

In the UK the company operating track and trace released thousands of email addresses of its workers before it became operational but stated it would not report it's self for breaching data protection..... in these people we trust?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Mps are revolting, apparently, over the proposed quarantining of travellers. 

Boris is, apparently, now in favour of "air briges"...... although why any country would agree to relax travel with a country with the second highest death rate in the world beggers belief...... so just the USA then??

The proposed quarantine rules have anomalies..... arriving passengers can use public transport leaving the airport, food shopping and giving more than one address they will quarantine at..... and others...... all of which seem to defeat the object of the quarantine 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As a comparison....... Thailand has a similar population to UK. 

Deaths... 57

Confirmed cases... 3,082

New cases......

local .. 0.... all new cases over several days have been from Thais returning from international destinations.

All arrivals are quarantined...... 20 arriving from the UK had high fever

33% of Thailand's economy is tourist related.

Major differences?

All arrivals get quarantined, temperature checks entering buildings and populated areas, curfew 10pm - 4.00am, face masks,  police road checkpoints between districts, average temperature 35c daytime.

Forgot the most important bit...... no flights, airport lockdown, international and domestic..... only repatriation flights allowed.

Yes the death rate is 57..... not 57,000

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

3 hours ago, geosname said:

Is it odd you can have sex with your lodger but not your neighbour?..... or at least you can't do it indoors but you can outdoors.

 

How can you do that from 2m away? Unless I've been doing it wrong. 

Edited by WV
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, WV said:

 

How can you do that from 2m away? Unless I've been doing it wrong. 

 

47 minutes ago, WV said:

 

How can you do that from 2m away? Unless I've been doing it wrong. 

I’d be in certain type of films if I could.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Reporting Posts and Ignoring Users

    Admin don't read everything. Don't assume we'll spot rule breaking. Please report posts and we'll act on ASAP. If you're logged in use the orange report post button. If you're not logged in, please use the contact form

    If you can't get on with another user you can "ignore" them. Follow the link, type in their username and save - Click here

    Check with admin if you wish to sell/auction any items. We're happy to support good causes but check first - Contact us here

  • Friends of OVF




×
×
  • Create New...