"Blue Sky or Blue Square"

[Wellington Bomber]

I thought Phil Sherwin's article was very good. He normally takes the "middle ground" in his Sentinel Column, but it appears that even he is showing signs of exasperation. Messrs LLoyd, Miller, Deakin take note!

[Tone]

The SC committee has already met with the Board once, Tone. You will have to ask the members how productive they felt the meeting was.

 

I will. But if talks were stopped on the basis of an unproductive meeting, the Berlin Wall would never have come down.

[geosname]

But the SC is choosing to not talk to the board. Or am I missing something?

 

Yes.... the rest of the post

[melv]

It will be a decision made by NLV in consultation with other groups, but the time certainly feels close at hand. There is plenty going on behind the scenes.

 

Taxi for Deakin, Lloyd, Miller and Oliver :D

 

You best get a move on Malc unless this is what you are referring to http://www.onevalefan.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=60119

[Fosse69]

Having a meeting with the board and an opinion as to whether individual people cannot be trusted are two separate things. Do you honestly think that in the commercial world or in politics every meeting that takes place is between people who totally trust each other? The world would get nowhere on that basis.

That I assume is why the world is currently where it is.

[Jacko51]

I will. But if talks were stopped on the basis of an unproductive meeting, the Berlin Wall would never have come down.

 

I never said the meeting was unproductive. Why did you assume that?

[Tone]

Yes.... the rest of the post

 

That I assume is why the world is currently where it is.

 

With remarks like those, no talks would ever be productive.

[Tone]

I never said the meeting was unproductive. Why did you assume that?

 

I never said that you said the meeting was unproductive. Why did you assume that? ;)

 

It was others who made that assertion and it was given as the reason for not having further talks.

[geosname]

With remarks like those, no talks would ever be productive.

 

If it cant be aired why air it with two reps who then cant relay it to the people they represent... isnt that divide and conquer?

There should be nothing shared with the supporters club reps that can not be shared with the supporters.... as soon as SC reps withhold information it fails and it fails the supporters.... all this secret squirrel stuff got us into this mess