John Coleman

[sheffieldclayhead]

No current manager in a job will touch us we are a shambles from owner to players

[Alan Baker]

coleman?? he left them & failed miserably. besides that poaching a manager rarely works out well.

 

Terry, You seen the League table?

[beasty77]

Rochdale lured him away a few years back and he didn't last 12 months?

 

Who would you like in charge of the Vale then? Even you got admit, things aren't looking good for us no more. Were currently the worst team in the football ******* League.

[1977Valiant]

I wouldn't want Coleman if I have to be honest.

[nightmare in a damaged bra]

Brown will get the bag and then it will be Chris Morgan for 3 months as our owner advertises the job and gives it to Keith Curle.

[JOHNNYAITCH]

Tisdale at Exeter has to be a possible? they're top of the league and unbeaten. Having said that, no half decent manager would want to be associated with Norman's failure factory.

He is worshipped at Exeter, well paid, has the club just how he wants it, he is the main man there, the city is really going places.....unless offered a ridiculous amount of cash and given the opportunity to build something special why would he even consider Port Vale

 

Would be great but a non starter

 

Sent from my F5121 using the onevalefan mobile app

[Hagrid]

Imagine not wanting a manager who has Stanley 2nd in the league on crowds of 1500 hahahahhahhaha

[Hagrid]

coleman?? he left them & failed miserably. besides that poaching a manager rarely works out well.

 

Really gone poorly for Paul Hurst, hasn't it?

[Hagrid]

"it didn't work at Rochdale so I'm going to take that one spell, with little to no knowledge of what was going on at Rochdale at the time, at arrive at the conclusion that I don't want Coleman, despite a decade of near-miraculous achievements on a non-league budget".

[SourceOfTheTrent]

What on earth makes anyone think Norman Overwaite would do what is necessary to tempt John Coleman away from his beloved Accy, which, I would imagine, would be quite a lot given our position and owner's behavioural track record.

 

Sent from my SM-A520F using the onevalefan mobile app

[werstayinup]

As much as i would like to see it i cant see us going for a manager currently employed by another club

[Portvale4]

Do you really think Coleman would come to Vale? No chance. Why would he jump ship from a stable club who progress year on year to a mess that Vale is in.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using onevalefan

[Mattholl]

Let's actually look at Vale for what it really is without all the political anti smurf crap. (smurf is a weapon but you lot seem to think he's a cross between hitler and lucifer).

 

Vale are-

 

One of 3-4 largest clubs in the league and are far better known to be noticed as a manager than most clubs in this league

 

Have one of the larger budgets in the division hence why we have a squad of 35 plus pros

 

A chairman who does have personal wealth and CAN should he choose purchase players or expand the budget without relying on crowds

 

A CEO and Owner who now leaves the manager to his own plans and let's them get on with thing. Hence why we have 3 loan wingers, 4 CBs playing yet have brought in full backs....etc....

 

Managers won't care about what the fans think of the owner that's not their issue. In terms of the real world nitty gritty Vale is a good proposition for a manager who wants to progress. Not often will they have a club that can get crowds of 6,000 if doing well on league 2, sign 15 players and get rid of 10 and be able to appoint a chief scout, coach, assistant manager etc... most have to keep the backroom team at this level. We aren't in a great position in the league but let's not actually confuse our feelings towards the owner with thinking every club on the planet is better run than ours....they aren't.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using onevalefan

[RailwayRowdy]

The harsh reality is that no manager in a job would want to come to the worst team in the football league which is "run" by the worst owner in the football league. That leaves you with managers who are out of work for a reason and untried rookie's with no experience. Or stick with Brown. Doesn't look promising does it ?

[Valiant in Brum]

Let's actually look at Vale for what it really is without all the political anti smurf crap. (smurf is a weapon but you lot seem to think he's a cross between hitler and lucifer).

 

Vale are-

 

One of 3-4 largest clubs in the league and are far better known to be noticed as a manager than most clubs in this league

 

Have one of the larger budgets in the division hence why we have a squad of 35 plus pros

 

A chairman who does have personal wealth and CAN should he choose purchase players or expand the budget without relying on crowds

 

A CEO and Owner who now leaves the manager to his own plans and let's them get on with thing. Hence why we have 3 loan wingers, 4 CBs playing yet have brought in full backs....etc....

 

Managers won't care about what the fans think of the owner that's not their issue. In terms of the real world nitty gritty Vale is a good proposition for a manager who wants to progress. Not often will they have a club that can get crowds of 6,000 if doing well on league 2, sign 15 players and get rid of 10 and be able to appoint a chief scout, coach, assistant manager etc... most have to keep the backroom team at this level. We aren't in a great position in the league but let's not actually confuse our feelings towards the owner with thinking every club on the planet is better run than ours....they aren't.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using onevalefan

 

Port Vale is higher end League One club that should have Championship ambitions.

 

WE have just had 2 rookie managers, a decent manager with this budget could win the league.