Shares: What are the Board Hiding

[JB78]

Just heard back from Marcus at the meeting;

 

ML & PD didn't know that the shares hadn't been included;

 

GO said that the information was the legal minimum - is this GO's idea of a new era of openness and transparency?

 

why give the legal minimum and not the helpful maximum? i wonder:rolleyes:

 

and as PD and ML 'didnt know ' are they now going to rectify this and send you what you wanted? did Marcus ask that?

[Valiant Haze]

Anyone think that, apart from other things, Glenn Oliver lacks any people skills?......

[1517sharps]

Bunch of corrupt low lifes.

[Stone Valiant]

Bunch of corrupt low lifes.

 

Ah yes, but soon there will be only GO left of them...now who has to wear the target for the AGM next I wonder :D

[1517sharps]

Ah yes, but soon there will be only GO left of them...now who has to wear the target for the AGM next I wonder :D

 

Well located and fixed in my sights.

[JB78]

Ah yes, but soon there will be only GO left of them...now who has to wear the target for the AGM next I wonder :D

 

do you believe this story of investment happening and bratt leaving by the end of september then?

[Stone Valiant]

do you believe this story of investment happening and bratt leaving by the end of september then?

 

:yes::yes::yes::yes:

[Timothius]

Just heard back from Marcus at the meeting;

 

ML & PD didn't know that the shares hadn't been included;

 

GO said that the information was the legal minimum - is this GO's idea of a new era of openness and transparency?

 

I think we will find that GO is talking out of his rear (again) and in fact the response is illegal.

[For Us All]

Just heard back from Marcus at the meeting;

 

ML & PD didn't know that the shares hadn't been included;

 

GO said that the information was the legal minimum - is this GO's idea of a new era of openness and transparency?

 

How anyone can trust this mob is beyond me.

[JB78]

:yes::yes::yes::yes:

 

i dont

 

and if it was i would be ****** off that they didnt insist on the tramp leaving as well

 

hope he is up at the agm for re election and lloyd shafts him

[Stone Valiant]

i dont

 

and if it was i would be ****** off that they didnt insist on the tramp leaving as well

 

hope he is up at the agm for re election and lloyd shafts him

 

At which point I refer you to my earlier response seeing as their have to be at least 2 directors up for re-election and they have to be from the last AGM and that only leaves ML & GO :D

[JB78]

At which point I refer you to my earlier response seeing as their have to be at least 2 directors up for re-election and they have to be from the last AGM and that only leaves ML & GO :D

 

and i refer to my earlier response........bratty will still be on the board by the next agm and this latest 'investment' wont materialise

[markymark]

Can they disclose person data? Surly people have to opt in for this to take place.

 

Also under the DPA Malcolm would have to have safe and secure security measures in place to keep such data secure. Seems like this is wide open to data protection abuse.

[Conrad]

I'd actually go for 1

 

I'd go for both.

[Conrad]

Just heard back from Marcus at the meeting;

 

ML & PD didn't know that the shares hadn't been included;

 

GO said that the information was the legal minimum - is this GO's idea of a new era of openness and transparency?

 

Thats a good start, the chairman not knowing whats going on.