Go on Liverpool !!!!!

[Guest]

Did you find Henderson in bed with your missus or something? He didn't have a good game and is carrying an injury at the moment, has been for a while now, but he was hardly a 2/10. A 5 would be much more sufficient which is under par/below average. Milner was better than a 5 too, and probably the only attacking player that was decent for Liverpool.

 

It's good for Liverpool that Flanagan is back. He's a full-back that loves to defend, which goes against the grain in today's game really. I think he could well do a Jamie Carragher, injury permitting, and make hundreds of appearances for Liverpool in the coming years. An under-rated player in my opinion.

 

No beachy lad u got admit Liverpool were so poor m8 ,u Stella 's m8 ain't u and I ain't got a Mrs I'm divorcing her this year lol so he can help himself to her :)

[TylerB]

No beachy lad u got admit Liverpool were so poor m8 ,u Stella 's m8 ain't u and I ain't got a Mrs I'm divorcing her this year lol so he can help himself to her :)

 

Liverpool were pants last night, I've not tried to say differently. But just don't know why you gave Henderson a 2, that's all.

[davidatpreston]

I really think Manchester City will win the final easily now, unless they decide to give it lower priority with all the other trophies they are lining up. Not that they are a great team compared to some sides in the last few years, but the standard in the Premiership has declined this season. Chelsea, Manchester United and Liverpool are now no better than Stoke, Leicester and Tottenham.

[Warren]

Liverpool are not in the best shape at the minute with the central defence and attack weakened with injuries and players that look tired. But the Stoke team did really well and I would say they have their strongest team ever. If they had a really prolific striker they could win the Premier League. But they haven't.

[Warren]

I really think Manchester City will win the final easily now, unless they decide to give it lower priority with all the other trophies they are lining up. Not that they are a great team compared to some sides in the last few years, but the standard in the Premiership has declined this season. Chelsea, Manchester United and Liverpool are now no better than Stoke, Leicester and Tottenham.

 

Liverpool have a good winning record against Man City in recent games. If their players are fit there is a reasonable chance even as underdogs.

[JOHNNYAITCH]

Liverpool have a good winning record against Man City in recent games. If their players are fit there is a reasonable chance even as underdogs.

 

I see it as City's to lose

 

They'll put out a strong team as it's not yet the business end of the season and whilst "lesser" clubs have caught up with the big boys by having mucho cash to spend and in the case of the likes of Stoke, Leicester, West Ham and Spurs spending it well (and they will get closer when the next TV deal kicks in) City still have more quality available than most

[TylerB]

I really think Manchester City will win the final easily now, unless they decide to give it lower priority with all the other trophies they are lining up. Not that they are a great team compared to some sides in the last few years, but the standard in the Premiership has declined this season. Chelsea, Manchester United and Liverpool are now no better than Stoke, Leicester and Tottenham.

 

You seem to either have forgot or simply choose to ignore the little fact that Liverpool have already slapped City this season. It will be a 50/50 final and one Liverpool can most certainly win.

[JOHNNYAITCH]

It's a two horse race and I predict that one of them will win although I'd make City odds on with Liverpool second favourites....either way one will finish second and the other next to last. Certainly Liverpool can win it..cos they are in the final

[For Us All]

Another poor decision by the officials to allow the KDB goal when the ball was clearly out when Sterling crossed the ball.

[JOHNNYAITCH]

That was just discussed on 5Live with (I think) Graham Poll who explained why the ref and lineo probably could not be certain that the ball was over the line due to distance, obscured view etc. I guess if they didn't see it they have to assume that it wan't over the line.

 

Haven't seen the goal myself but opinion seems to be pretty much 100% that it was over the line...some you win, some you lose.

 

Made more comical/controversial by the ref's apparent comment to Jagielka afterwards when he was moaning at the ref that he should look at his defending and not blame the ref; not appropriate but certainly put him in his place.