Jump to content

If Mo Chucks In The Towel?


PVTony

Recommended Posts

As far as I am concerned my refusal to buy a ST was not linked in any way to Mo (even though he has been treated abysmally) my refusal is as result of the way the current board has treated it's customers. For me nothing has changed so I will not attend Vale Park until Bratt, Oliver and Lloyd have left. Away matches only for me although it will hurt after 45 years. I really hope the lads do well although I think that Micky gas been really naive in joining the board

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advert:


  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If Mo decides that enough is enough and chucks in the towel and there is no other option to rid the club of the present board, do the S.E.O. & Black & Gold supporters have no choice but get behind the team and watch games at Vale park?

 

Would there be any point in continuing with S.E.O. & B. & G.?

 

Would we be cutting off our noses to spite our face's if Mick gets the team into a prominent promotion position?

 

OR, should we wait to see how long the present set up avoids administration.

 

It would be nice to know that Mo will NEVER quit.

 

(A quitter never wins and a winner never quits).

 

He hasn't let go of the soap yet never mind picked up a towel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If those who joined SEO to get Mo in then they are puddled. There is every chance that Mo will walk away even if the board pack in now, with due dillegence being the biggest reason. Those supporting SEO should be only doing it to get rid of the present board. I personally do not take part in SEO but wish for the present board to resign and let someone else take over where by I would be just as happy for the interim board to be running this club for a few seasons till they find the right person wether that be Mo or someone else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advert:


The board beat Mo Choudry to the Broxap shares (I know how, and it wasn't the cash).

Glenn Oliver didn't beat up anyone, the board were maximizing their vote, same as the other side were. All's fair and what not (I know).

Mo Choudry has lost interest, for the time being (I know).

Mr Sims has still not provided written proof that he has RW's proxy yet, although I don't doubt that this will be forthcoming eventually (I know).

MH from NLV has done nothing about raising the backing he requires to be a director, where is the share bank he mentioned just afer the EGM?. (I know)

Inconvenient facts. But fact's nonetheless. All is not lost though, I think the board genuinely want Sims onboard, and a.n. other, not sure about an NLV representative. Full credit to them for organizing the EGM, but is Malcolm Hirst or any other rep of NLV what we really want on the board. If they would pass their nominated place onto someone more local with a bit more business savvey (and cash) wouldn't that be better?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The board beat Mo Choudry to the Broxap shares (I know how, and it wasn't the cash).

Glenn Oliver didn't beat up anyone, the board were maximizing their vote, same as the other side were. All's fair and what not (I know).

Mo Choudry has lost interest, for the time being (I know).

Mr Sims has still not provided written proof that he has RW's proxy yet, although I don't doubt that this will be forthcoming eventually (I know).

MH from NLV has done nothing about raising the backing he requires to be a director, where is the share bank he mentioned just afer the EGM?. (I know)

Inconvenient facts. But fact's nonetheless. All is not lost though, I think theboard genuinely want Sims onboard, and a.n. other, not sure about a OVF representative. Full credit to them for organizing the EGM, but is Malcolm Hirst or any other rep of NLV what we really want on the board. If they would pass their nominated place onto someone more local with a bit more business savvey (and cash) wouldn't that be better?

 

1. correct

2. He didn't BEAT any-one up. (That was never suggested, check your facts cp)

3. Incorrect FACT

4.;)

5.;)

6. Incorrect

 

 

CP your contacts are either a) feeding you c*** OR

b) not keeping you in the loop;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

EVIL??? We do get a little hysterical don't we!
Not at all the way Bratt & Oliver are acting is nothing short of evil. They treat us all with contempt and still a few seem to think that the sun shines out of his proverbial. Yes I think that Bratt and his mate are evil.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. correct

2. He didn't BEAT any-one up. (That was never suggested, check your facts cp)

3. Incorrect FACT

4.;)

5.;)

6. Incorrect

 

 

CP your contacts are either a) feeding you c*** OR

b) not keeping you in the loop;)

 

We'll see Caroline. At least I got a few right. I don't have any contacts I just try to keep an open mind and keep communications open with a few people who might surprise you. I could be being spun a line, but I don't think so. Each of my statements above I got confirmed from both a (very) high placed pro and anti source (the "beat up" was metaphorical btw).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advert:


The board beat Mo Choudry to the Broxap shares (I know how, and it wasn't the cash).

Glenn Oliver didn't beat up anyone, the board were maximizing their vote, same as the other side were. All's fair and what not (I know).

Mo Choudry has lost interest, for the time being (I know).

Mr Sims has still not provided written proof that he has RW's proxy yet, although I don't doubt that this will be forthcoming eventually (I know).

MH from NLV has done nothing about raising the backing he requires to be a director, where is the share bank he mentioned just afer the EGM?. (I know)

Inconvenient facts. But fact's nonetheless. All is not lost though, I think the board genuinely want Sims onboard, and a.n. other, not sure about an NLV representative. Full credit to them for organizing the EGM, but is Malcolm Hirst or any other rep of NLV what we really want on the board. If they would pass their nominated place onto someone more local with a bit more business savvey (and cash) wouldn't that be better?

 

Only Jackson has enough shares to back NLV. NLV are representing small shareholders on the interim board, do you not think we should be there? Investment is open to all, they are quequing up. Why local? Would you not have Newton?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see Caroline. At least I got a few right. I don't have any contacts I just try to keep an open mind and keep communications open with a few people who might surprise you. I could be being spun a line, but I don't think so. Each of my statements above I got confirmed from both a (very) high placed pro and anti source.

 

Straight from the "horses" mouths on the inside and the out;) No propaganda, as I said just facts;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see Caroline. At least I got a few right. I don't have any contacts I just try to keep an open mind and keep communications open with a few people who might surprise you. I could be being spun a line, but I don't think so. Each of my statements above I got confirmed from both a (very) high placed pro and anti source (the "beat up" was metaphorical btw).

 

 

Maybe mataphorical but provocative (maybe, that was your intention?). Well placed source;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We'll see Caroline. At least I got a few right. I don't have any contacts I just try to keep an open mind and keep communications open with a few people who might surprise you. I could be being spun a line, but I don't think so. Each of my statements above I got confirmed from both a (very) high placed pro and anti source (the "beat up" was metaphorical btw).

 

Caroline is right and I'm afraid that you personally have been spun a line :yes:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Straight from the "horses" mouths on the inside and the out;) No propaganda, as I said just facts;)

 

Please don't start this innuendo again. Yes straight from the horses mouth. Would you prefer it if I stopped posting things that don't suit you? If so I will. I don't post any old thing that I just thought of here, it is carefully researched and thought out. If it's not wanted I'll deck it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advert:


I cannot really understand the anti-Mo posts. Lots of them profess not to trust his motives, while the only comment which originated from the board was "he wants to get us to the Championship, then sell us". Well roll on that I say. Mo has had to endure a vendetta and character assassination job from the board which has been quite frankly disgusting. If Mark Simms can give Mo his unqualified support and backing why is that not enough? Do you consider Mark to be a credulous fool that has been hoodwinked by the Machiavellian Mo, or maybe Mark has a new business in property development and has teamed up with Mo to flatten VP and build some nice yuppie condos. Just ask yourselves how many other clubs would turn down a deal such as Mo is proposing, then ask yourselves why our club is. Even if you are not a full on Mo supporter (and as it happens I'm not), surely he is a better bet than some dodgy Yanks with a dodgier deal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't start this innuendo again. Yes straight from the horses mouth. Would you prefer it if I stopped posting things that don't suit you? If so I will. I don't post any old thing that I just thought of here, it is carefully researched and thought out. If it's not wanted I'll deck it.

 

I don't think she's criticising what you personally post, more the truth of the information you are being told ..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Please don't start this innuendo again. Yes straight from the horses mouth. Would you prefer it if I stopped posting things that don't suit you? If so I will. I don't post any old thing that I just thought of here, it is carefully researched and thought out. If it's not wanted I'll deck it.

 

No innuendo on my part.

I felt that there was no hint of implication or suggestion in my posts. And you just have to do whatever suits your personal position. Please do not allow me or my posts influence that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Reporting Posts and Ignoring Users

    Admin don't read everything. Don't assume we'll spot rule breaking. Please report posts and we'll act on ASAP. If you're logged in use the orange report post button. If you're not logged in, please use the contact form

    If you can't get on with another user you can "ignore" them. Follow the link, type in their username and save - Click here

    Check with admin if you wish to sell/auction any items. We're happy to support good causes but check first - Contact us here

  • Friends of OVF




×
×
  • Create New...