onevalefan.co.uk Present Past Specials About Forum
Jump to content
onevalefan.co.uk forum

Advert


Advert


Liquidators


Recommended Posts

Whilst it would be great if all the "Directors" and Lodey got done, I guess that it may only be Lemon Zest and Mr Blobby (and poss Lodey) who will get shafted.

 

That said, it would just be great to see all 9 get publicly embarrassed on the front page of Senile.

 

I agree.

 

We have to look forward but we need to exorcise these demons. Or at least Oliver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Advert

Oliver and Bratt along with Jackson and Meigh will face no consequences as they bailed out or were removed in time, Lloyd and Deakin are the only fall guys maybe miller. We all know who the real villains are and sadly they will remain untouchable

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oliver and Bratt along with Jackson and Meigh will face no consequences as they bailed out or were removed in time, Lloyd and Deakin are the only fall guys maybe miller. We all know who the real villains are and sadly they will remain untouchable

 

Isn't Bratt liable because he appointed Deakin even though warnings about him were given.He allowed the vote with nil paid shares etc?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't Bratt liable because he appointed Deakin even though warnings about him were given?

 

The board appointed perry plus what warnings would stand up in court? Ps he was highly recommended by Karen Brady, the sad thing is no body will face any charges despite the fact we all know what went on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oliver and Bratt along with Jackson and Meigh will face no consequences as they bailed out or were removed in time, Lloyd and Deakin are the only fall guys maybe miller. We all know who the real villains are and sadly they will remain untouchable

 

we don't know yet if those buggers kept rigidly to company rules,lodey will have kept records and any misconduct will show up, liquidators are very thorough and if there is owt they'll find it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we don't know yet if those buggers kept rigidly to company rules,lodey will have kept records and any misconduct will show up, liquidators are very thorough and if there is owt they'll find it.

 

They will find sod all, it's sad but true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The board appointed perry plus what warnings would stand up in court? Ps he was highly recommended by Karen Brady, the sad thing is no body will face any charges despite the fact we all know what went on

 

theyt giving up afore theyne even started, give 'em chance, it took 4 years to nail ridsdale, they started to check him out in 2009.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They will find sod all, it's sad but true

 

Someone must be responsible for the nil paid share and the vote used by them.Then there is the offers to buy the club that were turned down,including one that was turned down that other directors didn't even know about.What about the remortgage of the ground?

 

It may well be difficult,it may take a while.But someone is responsible fiduciary responsibilities,acting in best interests of the company/shareholders etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The articles stipulated that to become a director a minimum amount of shares had to be purchased [unless sponsored {adams}].

The existing directors vote the new directors onto the board which is later ratified by a shareholders vote.

The directors who accepted the nominations without the purchase of shares are responsible for breaching the articles and lying to the shareholders.... all four... Bratt, Lloyd, Oliver and Adams voted Deakin and Miller onto the board when no purchase of shares had taken place, this was ratified by a shareholders vote on information supplied by the board that the shares had been paid for [the nominations being presented to the shareholders as eligible confirms this] therefore all four are responsible.... unless of course one director was not present at the vote, which makes the meeting inquorate and the decision invalid... which implies the missing director is complicit in the deception... Bratt, Lloyd, Oliver and Adams were the directors.... all four should be accountable.

 

from memory.... my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Reporting Posts and other information

    Rules - This forum is moderated but the admin team don't read everything. Don't assume we'll spot rule breaking and alert us by reporting content. Logged in users can hover over the post and click the orange button. Guests can contact us here. If you don't get on with another user you can "ignore" them. Click this link, type in their username and click save. Please check with the admin team if you wish to sell/auction any items. We're happy to support good causes but check first.

    Use - This forum may not be suitable for all as it may contain words or phrases not considered appropriate for some. You are personally responsible and potentially liable for the contents of your posting and could face legal action should it contain content of a defamatory or other illegal nature. Every message posted leaves a traceable IP number. Please do not reveal any personal information about yourself or anyone else (for example: phone number, address or email address). This forum is not in any way affiliated with Port Vale FC. OVF reserve the right to edit, delete, move or close any thread for any reason. If you spot an offensive post please report it to the admin team (instructions are above).

    Adverts - This site occasionally a) has adverts and sponsored features about gambling b) accepts sponsored posts from third parties. If you require help and advice on gambling read these links: Information on protecting young people | Addiction help from gambleaware.co.uk
  • Friends of OVF

×
×
  • Create New...