onevalefan.co.uk Present Past Specials About Forum
Jump to content
onevalefan.co.uk forum

Advert


Advert


Walka003

Members
  • Posts

    3,501
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Posts posted by Walka003





  1. I think the majority of fans will agree and thank Carol for buying the club, I don't think that's the issue. 
    What they talked about when they took over included transparency, communication, getting it right on the pitch 1st and more recently "Championship Ready".
    On saving the club 10 out of 10.  On the the other items, well this is the issue, this is where the discontent starts.
    Little if no transparency or communication (other than a very ill judged open letter to the fans), far from getting it right on the pitch and a million miles away from Championship ready.
    All we want are owners that will give us Transparency, Communication and Getting it Right on the Pitch as a Priority. 


    I agree that all that gimpy management speak about "championship ready" "want need expect" etc is so cringe now in the cold light of day that I'd imagine she's pretty embarrassed.

    Transparency though, I disagree. We as fans have reasonably frequent access to people like Matt Hancock and flickdick via fans forums and supporters club meetings. 1 month ago she sat down with the dicko, Mark porter and so on to hear there concerns and a week later she sacked the moron.

    Outside of a Sunderland till I die style documentary, I'm not sure what more we can ask for.

    • Like 3
  2. Actually a large proportion of the losses are interests on loans owed to her as I see it. So Carol’s kids will never starve with Vale around. 
    You have missed out page 9 that refers to the loans owed to creditors after 1 year.
    Those sentences refer to short term loans only  repayable within a year at 0%. Effectively that’s 1 year interest free. 
    The Barclays loan at 2.5% and others are detailed at Page 9 under point 7 under amounts due after 1 year. 
    That is debt to the club, not Carol as these are club accounts. 
     
    You've lost me completely here. How does a loan to barclays at a small interest rate mean that a large proportion of losses are interest owed to Carol?
  3. I'd echo Joe's point above. The numbers look scary, but it's not out of the ordinary. Clubs with positive balance sheets are very much in the minority. As long as someone is willing and able to prop you up, it's basically the route you have to take.

  4. Look at the loans taken out, then look at the interest. They are against the club, not personal expenditure by Carol. 
    All loans too carol and or related companies are interest free, according to the notes. So none of the losses relate to interest owed to Carol or her kids. Screenshot_20240412_140246.thumb.jpg.ef8d40bd381c453cbb0b2dbbdd32ce40.jpg
    • Thanks 3

  5. The club have released the accounts for the year ending June 2023, Kieran Maguire usually does a deep dive on club accounts so that might be out later today but the highlights (or lowlights) include:
     
    1) Total losses for the year - £3,396,024
     
    2) Cash balances dropped by £635,737 to £185,931
     
    3) Monies owed to the Shanahans or there related companies up £2,899,240 to £8,451,296
     
    4) Average number of employees up by 73 to 319 people
     
    5) Loans and other borrowing owed to bank up slightly to 121k

    • Thanks 2
  6. Just another vintage performance served up by the dreges of the football league that Flitcroft managed to pull together.

    Pathetic group of footballers, most of which wouldn't get a hire in the National League. We've been shown tonight what league one steady is and these fraudsters are miles away.

    • Like 1
  7. Walks, I agree with your comment with the exception of Walters he’s just a young lad. 
    He should not be playing in L1. He's no where close to ready. At least Dipepa and Shorrock show a bit of willing.

    The fact that we are begging him to sign a contract is laughable. There's no way the rumours of stoke can be true, he'll be lucky to get a contract with baisingstoke when we bin him in summer.

  8. How about Phil Sproson For DoF?
     
    No thank you.

    Foyle or someone with a similar track record. I don't want Sproson who'll only be interested in pushing his own players or Legge who has 0 experience. We tried the 0 experience route with Flitcroft/Crosby and look where that got us
    • Like 3
  9. Connor Grant, Gavin Massey, Ryan Loft, James Wilson, Uche, Jason Lowe, all the current loan players, Mitch Clarke, Dan Jones, Yak and Tom Sang fcked as far off as is humanly possible, regardless of division.

    Start again with what's left, Ripley Smith Debbie, ojo, Garrity, Chissy and Dipepa.

    • Like 1
    • Confused 1
  10. Most players have some kind of injury record. Problem is that those players have been key to how we play and were usually straight back in when fit. Which says to me that recruitment wise we hadn’t quite got it right so that we had adequate strength and depth to be able to rotate players. 
    I understand that, I also get that the reason we go for them is they are cheap cause no one else will touch them with a barge pole. We need to change the recruitment model or were always gonna encounter these issues.

    • Like 1
  11. There's no way it should be John Rudge as director of football for me:

    1) he's 80

    2) he's a club legend, if he took it and it went wrong it would take away from his relationship with the fans (see Dean Glover).

    3) people go on about his contact, that was 30+ years ago. None of those people will be still in football.

    • Like 7
    • Thanks 1
  12. Which brings me to my next question...Do we really need a DOF? 
    100% yes. If you want to keep up with modern football then you need the structure in place where the manager can manage and recruitment is dealt with by people who can throw all there energy into it. 

    What you shouldn't do is give it to a chancer who talks a good game. 


    • Like 4
  13. Very important time now for Carol. I think we definitely need a DoF, one with experience and a track record of success. Moore could be a good manager with a half decent team to look after, flicky has failed two years on the spin to produce one.

    We're behind you Carol, you've made the right call, now get the next call right!

    • Like 3
×
×
  • Create New...